An Exploration on Ethical Challenge of Scientific Misconduct in Publication of Medical Papers: Examples, Causes of plagiarism, and Practical Strategies to prevent it
{"title":"An Exploration on Ethical Challenge of Scientific Misconduct in Publication of Medical Papers: Examples, Causes of plagiarism, and Practical Strategies to prevent it","authors":"V. Zamanzadeh, M. Ghafourifard","doi":"10.52547/ethicnurs.5.1.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: One of the most important ethical challenges in research and academic writing is the scientific misconduct which is defined as violation of scientific regulations. The aim of this study was to review scientific misconduct as an unethical phenomenon. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted by using narrative review strategy in which a total of 56 papers was selected via search in databases such as PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Elsevier, and Iranian National Medical Digital Library (INMDL) according to the objective of the study. Results: First, we overlooked on scientific misconduct, meaning of plagiarism, the causes of plagiarism, its category, and penalties for plagiarism. The results showed that there is main three type of scientific misconduct including falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism which the latter is the most comment. We found fourteen type of plagiarism according to the literature review. Then, some online and offline software for detection of plagiarism cases were proposed. Finally, some practical strategies presented for prevention of plagiarism. Conclusion: We conclude that using another’s idea without appropriate acknowledging is considered as plagiarism which could have negative consequences and punishment for the perpetrator. Familiarization of researchers with cases of plagiarism and their commitment on ethical regulations and correctly acknowledgment of references and using software could be helpful in preventing this problem.","PeriodicalId":134473,"journal":{"name":"Education and Ethics in Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Ethics in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/ethicnurs.5.1.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction: One of the most important ethical challenges in research and academic writing is the scientific misconduct which is defined as violation of scientific regulations. The aim of this study was to review scientific misconduct as an unethical phenomenon. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted by using narrative review strategy in which a total of 56 papers was selected via search in databases such as PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Elsevier, and Iranian National Medical Digital Library (INMDL) according to the objective of the study. Results: First, we overlooked on scientific misconduct, meaning of plagiarism, the causes of plagiarism, its category, and penalties for plagiarism. The results showed that there is main three type of scientific misconduct including falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism which the latter is the most comment. We found fourteen type of plagiarism according to the literature review. Then, some online and offline software for detection of plagiarism cases were proposed. Finally, some practical strategies presented for prevention of plagiarism. Conclusion: We conclude that using another’s idea without appropriate acknowledging is considered as plagiarism which could have negative consequences and punishment for the perpetrator. Familiarization of researchers with cases of plagiarism and their commitment on ethical regulations and correctly acknowledgment of references and using software could be helpful in preventing this problem.
在研究和学术写作中最重要的伦理挑战之一是科学不端行为,它被定义为违反科学法规。这项研究的目的是回顾作为一种不道德现象的科学不端行为。材料和方法:本研究采用叙述性综述策略,根据研究目的,通过检索PubMed、ISI Web of Science、Scopus、EMBASE、Elsevier、伊朗国家医学数字图书馆(INMDL)等数据库,共筛选出56篇论文。结果:首先,我们忽略了科学不端行为、剽窃的含义、剽窃的原因、类别和剽窃的处罚。结果表明,科研不端行为主要有三种类型,即伪造、捏造和抄袭,其中以抄袭最多。根据文献综述,我们发现了14种类型的抄袭。然后,提出了一些在线和离线的剽窃案件检测软件。最后,提出了一些防止抄袭的实用策略。结论:我们的结论是,在没有适当承认的情况下使用他人的想法被认为是抄袭,这可能会对犯罪者产生负面影响和惩罚。让研究人员熟悉剽窃案例,了解他们对伦理规范的承诺,正确地确认参考文献和使用软件,可能有助于防止这一问题。