Beat-to-beat P-wave Variability Increases From Paroxysmal to Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Rita Laureanti, S. Zeemering, M. Zink, V. Corino, A. Auricchio, L. Mainardi, U. Schotten
{"title":"Beat-to-beat P-wave Variability Increases From Paroxysmal to Persistent Atrial Fibrillation","authors":"Rita Laureanti, S. Zeemering, M. Zink, V. Corino, A. Auricchio, L. Mainardi, U. Schotten","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2020.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to worsen over time. Beat-to-beat P-wave variability is used to evaluate the risk of developing AF, but it has not been used to monitor arrhythmia progression in a comprehensive model. The aim of this study is to create a method to measure beat-to-beat P-wave variability to evaluate AF types. ECG recordings of 5 minutes were measured on 159 AF patients. The first three principal components (PCs) of the ECG signal were added to the analysis. The temporal beat-to-beat P-wave variability was assessed through the normalized Euclidean Distance and the Similarity Index. The spatial P-wave similarity was measured as the percentage of variance explained by the first 2 PCs. A binomial logistic regression model was built for each lead and parameter, with AF type as dependent variable. To assess variability due exclusively to the P-waves, we considered, as confounding factors, other sources of ECG-variability, such as the noise level, the variability of the RR series and of the heart axis. Both temporal (e.g. 0.94±0.12 for paroxysmal AF and 0.85±0.28 for persistent AF in lead I, p=0.001) and spatial P-wave similarities (95.35±3.29% for paroxysmal AF vs 94.44±4.14% for persistent AF, p=0.001) were significantly higher in paroxysmal than in persistent AF, suggesting them as promising tools to evaluate AF types.","PeriodicalId":407282,"journal":{"name":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to worsen over time. Beat-to-beat P-wave variability is used to evaluate the risk of developing AF, but it has not been used to monitor arrhythmia progression in a comprehensive model. The aim of this study is to create a method to measure beat-to-beat P-wave variability to evaluate AF types. ECG recordings of 5 minutes were measured on 159 AF patients. The first three principal components (PCs) of the ECG signal were added to the analysis. The temporal beat-to-beat P-wave variability was assessed through the normalized Euclidean Distance and the Similarity Index. The spatial P-wave similarity was measured as the percentage of variance explained by the first 2 PCs. A binomial logistic regression model was built for each lead and parameter, with AF type as dependent variable. To assess variability due exclusively to the P-waves, we considered, as confounding factors, other sources of ECG-variability, such as the noise level, the variability of the RR series and of the heart axis. Both temporal (e.g. 0.94±0.12 for paroxysmal AF and 0.85±0.28 for persistent AF in lead I, p=0.001) and spatial P-wave similarities (95.35±3.29% for paroxysmal AF vs 94.44±4.14% for persistent AF, p=0.001) were significantly higher in paroxysmal than in persistent AF, suggesting them as promising tools to evaluate AF types.
从阵发性心房颤动到持续性心房颤动,搏动间p波变异性增加
已知心房颤动(AF)会随着时间的推移而恶化。搏动间p波变异性用于评估发生房颤的风险,但尚未在综合模型中用于监测心律失常进展。本研究的目的是创建一种方法来测量搏动-搏动纵波变异性,以评估房颤类型。对159例房颤患者进行5分钟心电图记录。将心电信号的前三个主成分(PCs)加入分析。通过标准化的欧几里得距离和相似指数来评估时间间隔的纵波变异性。空间p波相似度以前2个pc解释的方差百分比来衡量。以AF类型为因变量,对各导联及参数建立二项logistic回归模型。为了评估完全由p波引起的变异性,我们考虑了其他心电图变异性来源作为混杂因素,如噪声水平、RR序列和心轴的变异性。阵发性房颤的时间相似性(例如,I型导联中阵发性房颤为0.94±0.12,持续性房颤为0.85±0.28,p=0.001)和空间相似性(阵发性房颤为95.35±3.29%,持续性房颤为94.44±4.14%,p=0.001)均显著高于持续性房颤,提示它们是评估房颤类型的有希望的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信