An Evaluation Framework for Interactive Recommender Systems

O. Alkan, E. Daly, A. Botea
{"title":"An Evaluation Framework for Interactive Recommender Systems","authors":"O. Alkan, E. Daly, A. Botea","doi":"10.1145/3314183.3323680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional recommender systems present a relatively static list of recommendations to a user where the feedback is typically limited to an accept/reject or a rating model. However, these simple modes of feedback may only provide limited insights as to why a user likes or dislikes an item and what aspects of the item the user has considered. Interactive recommender systems present an opportunity to engage the user in the process by allowing them to interact with the recommendations, provide feedback and impact the results in real-time. Evaluation of the impact of the user interaction typically requires an extensive user study which is time consuming and gives researchers limited opportunities to tune their solutions without having to conduct multiple rounds of user feedback. Additionally, user experience and design aspects can have a significant impact on the user feedback which may result in not necessarily assessing the quality of some of the underlying algorithmic decisions in the overall solution. As a result, we present an evaluation framework which aims to simulate the users interacting with the recommender. We formulate metrics to evaluate the quality of the interactive recommenders which are outputted by the framework once simulation is completed. While simulation alone is not sufficient to evaluate a complete solution, the results can be useful to help researchers tune their solution before moving to the user study stage.","PeriodicalId":240482,"journal":{"name":"Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3314183.3323680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Traditional recommender systems present a relatively static list of recommendations to a user where the feedback is typically limited to an accept/reject or a rating model. However, these simple modes of feedback may only provide limited insights as to why a user likes or dislikes an item and what aspects of the item the user has considered. Interactive recommender systems present an opportunity to engage the user in the process by allowing them to interact with the recommendations, provide feedback and impact the results in real-time. Evaluation of the impact of the user interaction typically requires an extensive user study which is time consuming and gives researchers limited opportunities to tune their solutions without having to conduct multiple rounds of user feedback. Additionally, user experience and design aspects can have a significant impact on the user feedback which may result in not necessarily assessing the quality of some of the underlying algorithmic decisions in the overall solution. As a result, we present an evaluation framework which aims to simulate the users interacting with the recommender. We formulate metrics to evaluate the quality of the interactive recommenders which are outputted by the framework once simulation is completed. While simulation alone is not sufficient to evaluate a complete solution, the results can be useful to help researchers tune their solution before moving to the user study stage.
交互式推荐系统的评价框架
传统的推荐系统向用户呈现一个相对静态的推荐列表,其中反馈通常限于接受/拒绝或评级模型。然而,这些简单的反馈模式可能只能提供有限的见解,比如用户为什么喜欢或不喜欢某件商品,以及用户考虑了该商品的哪些方面。交互式推荐系统提供了一个机会,让用户参与到这个过程中,允许他们与推荐互动,提供反馈并实时影响结果。评估用户交互的影响通常需要广泛的用户研究,这是耗时的,并且给研究人员提供了有限的机会来调整他们的解决方案,而不必进行多轮用户反馈。此外,用户体验和设计方面可能会对用户反馈产生重大影响,这可能导致不一定要评估整体解决方案中某些潜在算法决策的质量。因此,我们提出了一个旨在模拟用户与推荐人交互的评估框架。我们制定了指标来评估框架在模拟完成后输出的交互式推荐的质量。虽然单独的模拟不足以评估一个完整的解决方案,但结果可以帮助研究人员在进入用户研究阶段之前调整他们的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信