Novelization of the provisions of the Criminal Code on circumstances that exclude a criminal offense under martial law

Yurii Anatoliiovych Ponomarenko
{"title":"Novelization of the provisions of the Criminal Code on circumstances that exclude a criminal offense under martial law","authors":"Yurii Anatoliiovych Ponomarenko","doi":"10.21564/2311-9640.2022.17.256785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of lawful behavior of civilians, who during and in order to protect Ukraine cause harm to the aggressor state. Relevant amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Articles 43-1 and 22 of the Final and Transitional Provisions), which were introduced during the large-scale war with Russia, have been studied.\nIt has been established that both of these legal norms provide for a subjective right, but not a legal obligation, of an individual (not a combatant) to harm the lives of soldiers and government officials of the aggressor state, property interests of the aggressor state, etc. The basis for a person to exercise this subjective right has been determined. The signs that the lawful behavior of a person defending Ukraine from foreign aggression should correspond to are established. In particular, it is established that such conduct must be directed exclusively against the interests of the aggressor state and may not harm anyone else's interests. The lawful infliction of harm is possible at any time from the imposition of martial law to its termination. The purpose of the lawful establishment of the school is solely to protect Ukraine from foreign aggression.\nThe limits of lawful infliction of harm to the aggressor are separately analyzed and it is concluded that the current criminal legislation of Ukraine allows the possibility of inflicting any kind and amount of harm to the aggressor. On this basis, it was concluded that it is impossible to exceed the limits of lawful harm to the aggressor, and hence – the impossibility of criminal liability for exceeding such limits.\nA number of recommendations for courts and pre-trial investigation bodies on the practical application of Art. 43-1 and paragraph 22 of the Final and Transitional Provisions of the Criminal Code. Separately formulated and substantiated proposals for amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine aimed at improving the analyzed norms.","PeriodicalId":387320,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine","volume":"134 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2311-9640.2022.17.256785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of lawful behavior of civilians, who during and in order to protect Ukraine cause harm to the aggressor state. Relevant amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Articles 43-1 and 22 of the Final and Transitional Provisions), which were introduced during the large-scale war with Russia, have been studied. It has been established that both of these legal norms provide for a subjective right, but not a legal obligation, of an individual (not a combatant) to harm the lives of soldiers and government officials of the aggressor state, property interests of the aggressor state, etc. The basis for a person to exercise this subjective right has been determined. The signs that the lawful behavior of a person defending Ukraine from foreign aggression should correspond to are established. In particular, it is established that such conduct must be directed exclusively against the interests of the aggressor state and may not harm anyone else's interests. The lawful infliction of harm is possible at any time from the imposition of martial law to its termination. The purpose of the lawful establishment of the school is solely to protect Ukraine from foreign aggression. The limits of lawful infliction of harm to the aggressor are separately analyzed and it is concluded that the current criminal legislation of Ukraine allows the possibility of inflicting any kind and amount of harm to the aggressor. On this basis, it was concluded that it is impossible to exceed the limits of lawful harm to the aggressor, and hence – the impossibility of criminal liability for exceeding such limits. A number of recommendations for courts and pre-trial investigation bodies on the practical application of Art. 43-1 and paragraph 22 of the Final and Transitional Provisions of the Criminal Code. Separately formulated and substantiated proposals for amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine aimed at improving the analyzed norms.
《刑法》关于戒严下排除刑事犯罪的情形的规定的新化
本文致力于分析平民在侵略国期间和为了保护乌克兰而对侵略国造成伤害的合法行为。对乌克兰在与俄罗斯的大规模战争期间提出的《刑法》的有关修正案(《最后和过渡规定》第43-1条和第22条)进行了研究。已经确定的是,这两个法律规范都规定了个人(不是战斗人员)的主观权利,而不是法律义务,以损害侵略者国家的士兵和政府官员的生命,侵略者国家的财产利益等。一个人行使这一主观权利的基础已经确定。保卫乌克兰免受外国侵略的合法行为应该符合的迹象已经确立。特别是,确定这种行为必须完全针对侵略国的利益,不得损害任何其他国家的利益。从实行戒严法到解除戒严法,任何时候都可以合法地施加伤害。合法建立这所学校的目的仅仅是为了保护乌克兰免受外国侵略。分别分析了对侵略者合法造成伤害的限度,得出的结论是,乌克兰目前的刑事立法允许对侵略者造成任何种类和数量的伤害的可能性。在此基础上,得出的结论是,不可能超过对侵略者的合法伤害的限度,因此不可能因超过这种限度而承担刑事责任。就《刑法》最后和过渡条款第43-1条和第22款的实际适用问题向法院和审前调查机构提出若干建议。分别拟订和证实了修改乌克兰刑法的建议,目的是改进所分析的准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信