An Exploration of Relationships Between Perceptual and Cognitive Racial Biases

Nathan Fisher, Victoria Maskas, Addison Sans, Peter D. Kvam, Brian Odegaard
{"title":"An Exploration of Relationships Between Perceptual and Cognitive Racial Biases","authors":"Nathan Fisher, Victoria Maskas, Addison Sans, Peter D. Kvam, Brian Odegaard","doi":"10.32473/ufjur.24.130769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People are often biased in how they evaluate characteristics of individuals of different races. Some of these biases are perceptual: for example, the “race-lightness effect” demonstrates that for grayscale photos at equivalent luminance values, the faces of black individuals are frequently judged to be darker than the faces of white individuals. Other biases are cognitive: the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and direct assessments of racial attitudes demonstrate that people hold both negative implicit and explicit racial prejudices. Despite extensive literature on both topics, no study has explored the relationship between perceptual and cognitive racial biases in the same individuals in a within-subjects design. In this experiment, these relationships were explored in 28 individuals using three tasks: in one task, deemed the Race-Lightness Task (RLT), participants completed a 2-interval forced-choice procedure where they were shown pairs of faces (some with European features, some with African features) and asked to judge whether the second face was lighter or darker than the first. In a second task, individuals completed the IAT to measure their associations between race and positive/negative adjectives. Lastly, subjects answered a series of questions to measure explicit attitudes about different racial groups. While results from the RLT and IAT were uncorrelated, a significant correlation was shown between the IAT and a survey question about systemic racism. These results provide preliminary support for the independence of perception and cognition for racially based tasks, and provide insight into the pervasive nature of implicit and explicit racial prejudice.","PeriodicalId":278243,"journal":{"name":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","volume":"437 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32473/ufjur.24.130769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People are often biased in how they evaluate characteristics of individuals of different races. Some of these biases are perceptual: for example, the “race-lightness effect” demonstrates that for grayscale photos at equivalent luminance values, the faces of black individuals are frequently judged to be darker than the faces of white individuals. Other biases are cognitive: the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and direct assessments of racial attitudes demonstrate that people hold both negative implicit and explicit racial prejudices. Despite extensive literature on both topics, no study has explored the relationship between perceptual and cognitive racial biases in the same individuals in a within-subjects design. In this experiment, these relationships were explored in 28 individuals using three tasks: in one task, deemed the Race-Lightness Task (RLT), participants completed a 2-interval forced-choice procedure where they were shown pairs of faces (some with European features, some with African features) and asked to judge whether the second face was lighter or darker than the first. In a second task, individuals completed the IAT to measure their associations between race and positive/negative adjectives. Lastly, subjects answered a series of questions to measure explicit attitudes about different racial groups. While results from the RLT and IAT were uncorrelated, a significant correlation was shown between the IAT and a survey question about systemic racism. These results provide preliminary support for the independence of perception and cognition for racially based tasks, and provide insight into the pervasive nature of implicit and explicit racial prejudice.
感性种族偏见与认知种族偏见的关系探讨
人们在评价不同种族的人的特点时往往带有偏见。其中一些偏见是感性的:例如,“种族亮度效应”表明,对于同等亮度值的灰度照片,黑人的脸经常被认为比白人的脸更暗。其他偏见是认知上的:内隐联想测试(IAT)和对种族态度的直接评估表明,人们同时持有消极的内隐和外显种族偏见。尽管在这两个主题上有大量的文献,但没有研究在受试者内设计中探讨同一个体的感知和认知种族偏见之间的关系。在这个实验中,28个人通过三个任务来探索这些关系:在一个任务中,被称为种族-亮度任务(RLT),参与者完成了一个两间隔的强迫选择程序,在这个过程中,他们看到了几对面孔(一些是欧洲人的特征,一些是非洲人的特征),并被要求判断第二张脸是比第一张脸更亮还是更暗。在第二个任务中,被试完成了IAT测试,以衡量他们在种族和积极/消极形容词之间的联系。最后,研究对象回答了一系列问题,以衡量他们对不同种族群体的明确态度。虽然RLT和IAT的结果不相关,但IAT和一个关于系统性种族主义的调查问题之间存在显著的相关性。这些结果为基于种族的任务的感知和认知独立性提供了初步支持,并为内隐和外显种族偏见的普遍本质提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信