Do Skirts on Board Impact Figures in Books?

A. Tahir
{"title":"Do Skirts on Board Impact Figures in Books?","authors":"A. Tahir","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2926637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the financial crisis of 2007, a wave of discussion started that who sits on board is a critical factor in deciding the success and failure of a company. Research has found links between diverse boards and its positive effects on board inputs (Daniel Ferreira). Countries have rigorously passed laws and legislations without considering the fact there a complex relationship between women on board and performance and several other factors are needed to consider before making a strong assumption. The perceived importance of gender equality in board rooms (Nielson & Huse, 2010) do not points towards a clear opinion on whether gender equality in boardrooms will definitely yield better economic results (Hamdani & Buckley, 2010; Jonas Vob, 2015). A data for FTSE 100 companies was analyzed from 2006-2012 using Random Effects regression model. The results of this research does not support the business case of higher gender diversity for higher profits. This does not imply gender diversity should not be promoted. It is good to have gender diverse boards because of the positive behavioral impact they create on overall environment of an organization. Higher representation of women on board might not relate to the higher profits but diversified boards are critical in better decision making because of the benefit of diverse perspectives’. Equality should be promoted in work environment for ethical reasons and everyone should get a chance to make it to the top level if they are good enough.","PeriodicalId":169736,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Equity & Diversity (Topic)","volume":"344 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Equity & Diversity (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2926637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the financial crisis of 2007, a wave of discussion started that who sits on board is a critical factor in deciding the success and failure of a company. Research has found links between diverse boards and its positive effects on board inputs (Daniel Ferreira). Countries have rigorously passed laws and legislations without considering the fact there a complex relationship between women on board and performance and several other factors are needed to consider before making a strong assumption. The perceived importance of gender equality in board rooms (Nielson & Huse, 2010) do not points towards a clear opinion on whether gender equality in boardrooms will definitely yield better economic results (Hamdani & Buckley, 2010; Jonas Vob, 2015). A data for FTSE 100 companies was analyzed from 2006-2012 using Random Effects regression model. The results of this research does not support the business case of higher gender diversity for higher profits. This does not imply gender diversity should not be promoted. It is good to have gender diverse boards because of the positive behavioral impact they create on overall environment of an organization. Higher representation of women on board might not relate to the higher profits but diversified boards are critical in better decision making because of the benefit of diverse perspectives’. Equality should be promoted in work environment for ethical reasons and everyone should get a chance to make it to the top level if they are good enough.
船上的裙子对书中的人物有影响吗?
2007年金融危机后,掀起了一股讨论浪潮,认为董事会成员是决定公司成败的关键因素。研究发现了不同董事会之间的联系及其对董事会投入的积极影响(丹尼尔·费雷拉)。各国严格地通过法律和立法,却没有考虑到在职妇女与业绩之间存在复杂的关系,在作出强有力的假设之前还需要考虑其他几个因素。对董事会性别平等重要性的认知(Nielson & house, 2010)并没有明确指出董事会性别平等是否一定会产生更好的经济效益(Hamdani & Buckley, 2010;Jonas Vob, 2015)。本文采用随机效应回归模型对富时100指数成分股2006-2012年的数据进行了分析。这项研究的结果不支持更高性别多样性带来更高利润的商业案例。这并不意味着不应促进性别多样性。拥有性别多元化的董事会是件好事,因为这会对组织的整体环境产生积极的行为影响。董事会中女性比例的增加可能与更高的利润无关,但多元化的董事会对更好的决策至关重要,因为多元化的视角会带来好处。”出于道德原因,应该在工作环境中促进平等,每个人都应该有机会达到最高水平,如果他们足够好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信