Lessons in Survival: The De-funding of Restless Dance Theatre

Maggie Tonkin
{"title":"Lessons in Survival: The De-funding of Restless Dance Theatre","authors":"Maggie Tonkin","doi":"10.14361/zkmm-2022-0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In March 2020, Michelle Ryan, Artistic Director of Restless Dance Theatre, an Australian dance company that includes both disabled and non-disabled dancers, was awarded Australia’s highest dance honour by the Australia Council, the federal arts funding body, for her transformative leadership of the company. Almost simultaneously, the very same Australia Council removed funding support for Restless, threatening the company’s survival. This essay examines Restless’s response to the fundamental incoherence of the Australia Council’s decision and situates it within the broader context of the company’s own evolving practice in disability art, which in effect saw it attempt to create policy in the field. I outline the government policy contexts that underpin both the funding cuts and Restless’s pivot to an alternate source of funding: the ideologically driven ‘culture wars’ underpinning the Coalition government’s hostility to the arts sector, and the establishment of a National Disability Insurance Scheme that enables individual ‘clients’ to access money for arts training. Finally, the essay examines the implications of a dance company receiving funding from a disability service provider rather than from a mainstream arts funding body, questioning whether this is a further ‘ghettoization’ of disability art.","PeriodicalId":133836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy / Zeitschrift für Kulturmanagement und Kulturpolitik","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy / Zeitschrift für Kulturmanagement und Kulturpolitik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/zkmm-2022-0207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In March 2020, Michelle Ryan, Artistic Director of Restless Dance Theatre, an Australian dance company that includes both disabled and non-disabled dancers, was awarded Australia’s highest dance honour by the Australia Council, the federal arts funding body, for her transformative leadership of the company. Almost simultaneously, the very same Australia Council removed funding support for Restless, threatening the company’s survival. This essay examines Restless’s response to the fundamental incoherence of the Australia Council’s decision and situates it within the broader context of the company’s own evolving practice in disability art, which in effect saw it attempt to create policy in the field. I outline the government policy contexts that underpin both the funding cuts and Restless’s pivot to an alternate source of funding: the ideologically driven ‘culture wars’ underpinning the Coalition government’s hostility to the arts sector, and the establishment of a National Disability Insurance Scheme that enables individual ‘clients’ to access money for arts training. Finally, the essay examines the implications of a dance company receiving funding from a disability service provider rather than from a mainstream arts funding body, questioning whether this is a further ‘ghettoization’ of disability art.
生存的教训:不安分的舞蹈剧院的撤资
2020年3月,澳大利亚舞蹈公司Restless Dance Theatre的艺术总监米歇尔·瑞安(Michelle Ryan)被联邦艺术资助机构澳大利亚理事会授予澳大利亚最高舞蹈荣誉,以表彰她对该公司的变革性领导。该公司包括残疾人和非残疾人舞者。几乎与此同时,澳大利亚议会取消了对Restless的资金支持,威胁到了该公司的生存。本文考察了Restless对澳大利亚理事会决定的根本不连贯的回应,并将其置于该公司自身在残疾人艺术领域不断发展的实践的更广泛背景中,这实际上看到了它试图在该领域制定政策。我概述了政府的政策背景,这些政策背景既支持了资金削减,也支持了Restless转向另一种资金来源:意识形态驱动的“文化战争”支撑了联合政府对艺术部门的敌意,并建立了国家残疾保险计划,使个人“客户”能够获得艺术培训的资金。最后,本文探讨了舞蹈公司接受残疾人服务提供者而不是主流艺术资助机构资助的影响,并质疑这是否进一步“隔离”了残疾人艺术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信