Mad culture

M. Rashed
{"title":"Mad culture","authors":"M. Rashed","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198786863.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the viability of the notion of “Mad culture” as an alternative to the formulation of madness as a disorder of the mind. The chapter addresses the following questions: What is culture? Can madness constitute a culture? What are the justifications for cultural rights? Do people have a right to their culture or to any culture? In the process of answering these questions, the chapter compares and contrasts Mad culture and Deaf culture. It also engages with Will Kymlicka’s theory of cultural rights as civil rights, which centers on the idea of culture as a “context of choice.”","PeriodicalId":222338,"journal":{"name":"Madness and the demand for recognition","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Madness and the demand for recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198786863.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This chapter examines the viability of the notion of “Mad culture” as an alternative to the formulation of madness as a disorder of the mind. The chapter addresses the following questions: What is culture? Can madness constitute a culture? What are the justifications for cultural rights? Do people have a right to their culture or to any culture? In the process of answering these questions, the chapter compares and contrasts Mad culture and Deaf culture. It also engages with Will Kymlicka’s theory of cultural rights as civil rights, which centers on the idea of culture as a “context of choice.”
疯狂的文化
本章探讨了“疯狂文化”这一概念的可行性,以替代将疯狂表述为精神紊乱的说法。这一章探讨了以下问题:什么是文化?疯狂能构成一种文化吗?文化权利的理由是什么?人们对自己的文化或任何文化有权利吗?在回答这些问题的过程中,本章对疯子文化和聋人文化进行了比较和对比。它还与Will Kymlicka将文化权利作为公民权利的理论相结合,该理论以文化作为“选择语境”的理念为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信