The Colophon: Where moving parts come together

Lucy Meyle, Emily O'Hara, Monique Redmond
{"title":"The Colophon: Where moving parts come together","authors":"Lucy Meyle, Emily O'Hara, Monique Redmond","doi":"10.24135/link2021.v2i1.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This proposal considers the colophon as a conceptual structure for thinking through lists and listing within our creative practice(s). Conventionally, the colophon is a short piece of text that details information about the making of a publication or its intended use. Most often, the colophon specifies the how, where, and when: the typeface and paper stock; the location, date, edition number, and method of printing. It can also foreground the relational aspects of publishing – the with who or the why here. Colophons appear at the opening or the closing of a publication, and the information within them can form a kind of ballast to what precedes or succeeds them. That is, the listing of the material, processual, and relational labour that went into the making of publications is called forward in the colophon and acknowledged as structural necessity. Often, we are led to ask, how is this conception of the colophon useful in thinking about the other types of lists and listings that make their way into our collective practices? —Runsheets, Material lists, Contents, Title lists, Indexes, Captions, Legends, Rosters, Glossaries, Registers, Manifests, Chronologies— These modes of listing communicate relevant and important contexts and, in that way, become a conceptual part of creative works themselves. As formats, they are all also citational practices where the materials, processes, information, and relations are shared freely – as any written text would be in a publication’s reference list. In their book, The Hundreds (2019), cultural theorists Lauren Berlant and Kathleen Stewart list Adorno and Agamben texts next to “An egg-cooking machine” and “A few pansies stuck in a window box” in the reference section, all alphabetised under the title “Some Things We Thought With”1. This type of list (and the concept of a colophon itself) is not an indiscriminate breaking-down into separate parts but a strategic highlighting of the conditions and abstractions of the artwork. The colophon as a structure in this context exists not only to acknowledge what contributes to a publication but also to trace possible points of departure from convention. As a tactic within creative practice, the colophon is like a conceptual abstraction; it holds all of the constituent parts that make up a project in one place. The ‘—with’ that Berlant and Stewart explore is key to the how, where, and when of relations that the doing of listing brings together. As artists working in the inter-related fields of socially engaged art, object-making, installation, and publication, our list of interests include the moon, the water, the sky; flowers, ceramics, printed matter; ducks, snails, butter. This paper will share our three perspectives on listing as a synchronous tactic with the functioning action of a colophon. Where words and images get to turn, twist, veer, bow, dip, and nod, and the conceptual form of a project takes shape with things.","PeriodicalId":238231,"journal":{"name":"Link Symposium Abstracts 2020","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Link Symposium Abstracts 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/link2021.v2i1.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This proposal considers the colophon as a conceptual structure for thinking through lists and listing within our creative practice(s). Conventionally, the colophon is a short piece of text that details information about the making of a publication or its intended use. Most often, the colophon specifies the how, where, and when: the typeface and paper stock; the location, date, edition number, and method of printing. It can also foreground the relational aspects of publishing – the with who or the why here. Colophons appear at the opening or the closing of a publication, and the information within them can form a kind of ballast to what precedes or succeeds them. That is, the listing of the material, processual, and relational labour that went into the making of publications is called forward in the colophon and acknowledged as structural necessity. Often, we are led to ask, how is this conception of the colophon useful in thinking about the other types of lists and listings that make their way into our collective practices? —Runsheets, Material lists, Contents, Title lists, Indexes, Captions, Legends, Rosters, Glossaries, Registers, Manifests, Chronologies— These modes of listing communicate relevant and important contexts and, in that way, become a conceptual part of creative works themselves. As formats, they are all also citational practices where the materials, processes, information, and relations are shared freely – as any written text would be in a publication’s reference list. In their book, The Hundreds (2019), cultural theorists Lauren Berlant and Kathleen Stewart list Adorno and Agamben texts next to “An egg-cooking machine” and “A few pansies stuck in a window box” in the reference section, all alphabetised under the title “Some Things We Thought With”1. This type of list (and the concept of a colophon itself) is not an indiscriminate breaking-down into separate parts but a strategic highlighting of the conditions and abstractions of the artwork. The colophon as a structure in this context exists not only to acknowledge what contributes to a publication but also to trace possible points of departure from convention. As a tactic within creative practice, the colophon is like a conceptual abstraction; it holds all of the constituent parts that make up a project in one place. The ‘—with’ that Berlant and Stewart explore is key to the how, where, and when of relations that the doing of listing brings together. As artists working in the inter-related fields of socially engaged art, object-making, installation, and publication, our list of interests include the moon, the water, the sky; flowers, ceramics, printed matter; ducks, snails, butter. This paper will share our three perspectives on listing as a synchronous tactic with the functioning action of a colophon. Where words and images get to turn, twist, veer, bow, dip, and nod, and the conceptual form of a project takes shape with things.
Colophon:活动部件聚集在一起的地方
本提案将colophon视为一种概念性结构,用于在我们的创作实践中思考列表和列表。通常,版主是一段简短的文字,详细说明出版物的制作或预期用途。最常见的是,版号规定了如何、在哪里和何时:字体和纸张;印刷地点、日期、版号和印刷方法。它还可以突出出版的关系方面——与谁或为什么在这里。版主出现在出版物的开始或结束时,其中的信息可以形成一种压载物,用于之前或之后的内容。也就是说,材料,过程和关系劳动的清单进入出版物的制作被称为在colophon和承认结构上的必要性。通常,我们会问,在思考其他类型的列表和清单时,colophon的概念对我们的集体实践有什么帮助?-概要表、材料列表、内容、标题列表、索引、标题、图例、花名册、词汇表、注册表、清单、年表——这些列表模式传达了相关和重要的背景,并以这种方式成为创意作品本身的概念部分。作为格式,它们都是引用实践,其中材料、过程、信息和关系都是自由共享的——就像出版物的参考书目中任何书面文本一样。在他们的书《数百》(2019)中,文化理论家劳伦·伯兰和凯瑟琳·斯图尔特在参考文献部分将阿多诺和阿甘本的文本列在“煮蛋机”和“卡在窗框里的几朵三色堇”旁边,所有这些文本都按字母顺序排列在“我们思考的一些东西”的标题下。这种类型的列表(以及colophon本身的概念)并不是不分青红皂白地分解成单独的部分,而是策略性地突出了艺术品的条件和抽象。在这种情况下,版主作为一种结构存在,不仅是为了承认对出版物的贡献,而且是为了追踪可能偏离惯例的点。作为创作实践中的一种策略,colophon就像是一种概念抽象;它在一个地方容纳了组成项目的所有组成部分。伯兰特和斯图尔特探索的“与”是如何、在哪里、在什么时候把上市的行为联系在一起的关键。作为从事社会参与艺术、物品制作、装置和出版等相互关联领域的艺术家,我们的兴趣包括月亮、水、天空;花卉、陶瓷、印刷品;鸭子,蜗牛,黄油。本文将分享我们的三个观点,列出作为一个同步策略与版主的功能作用。在这里,文字和图像可以转动、扭曲、转向、弯曲、倾斜和点头,项目的概念形式与事物一起形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书