Community-Based Health Insurance Enrollment and Determinants in Addis Ababa: Insights from Behavioral Economics and Discrete Choice Experiments

Abel Eshetu, Abrham Seyoum
{"title":"Community-Based Health Insurance Enrollment and Determinants in Addis Ababa: Insights from Behavioral Economics and Discrete Choice Experiments","authors":"Abel Eshetu, Abrham Seyoum","doi":"10.11648/J.HEP.20190404.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community-based health insurance target those employed in the rural and informal sector in urban by pooling risks and protect households from out-of-pocket expenditures when receiving health facility services. However, Ethiopian community-based health insurance is schemes characterized by low enrollment. The aim of this study is to analyze the determinants of community-based health insurance enrollment in Addis Ababa from behavioral economics and discrete choice experiment insights. A total of 222 households from ten pilot woredas were selected for the study using a simple random sampling technique. A simple social experiment is used to examine the significance of behavioral biases. A discrete choice experiment conducted across three attributes and conditional logit model used to determine the relative importance of the selected attributes and willingness-to-pay for those attributes. In addition, the binary logit regression model is used to estimate the probability of households enrollment in community-based health insurance. The study result indicates that households have the highest willingness to pay for only private health service providers (Birr 1849.6/year) compared to status-quo level. Non-member households’ willingness to pay for comprehensive health service package Birr 2271.7/year. Moreover, this study revealed loss-aversion bias, over-optimistic bias, and herding bias had significantly affected the household decision on community-based health insurance enrollment. The study suggests that behavioral biases affect Community-based health insurance enrollment. The study finding also reveals that respondent households are willingness to pay more for comprehensive health service package and for health insurance scheme that includes private health service providers. In addition, the study concludes eligible household enrollment decision varied based on their socio-demographic and household characteristic. This study recommends the need to consider mandatory community-based health insurance schemes and apply targeting intervention (coverage) to the particular group.","PeriodicalId":213187,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Policy","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.HEP.20190404.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Community-based health insurance target those employed in the rural and informal sector in urban by pooling risks and protect households from out-of-pocket expenditures when receiving health facility services. However, Ethiopian community-based health insurance is schemes characterized by low enrollment. The aim of this study is to analyze the determinants of community-based health insurance enrollment in Addis Ababa from behavioral economics and discrete choice experiment insights. A total of 222 households from ten pilot woredas were selected for the study using a simple random sampling technique. A simple social experiment is used to examine the significance of behavioral biases. A discrete choice experiment conducted across three attributes and conditional logit model used to determine the relative importance of the selected attributes and willingness-to-pay for those attributes. In addition, the binary logit regression model is used to estimate the probability of households enrollment in community-based health insurance. The study result indicates that households have the highest willingness to pay for only private health service providers (Birr 1849.6/year) compared to status-quo level. Non-member households’ willingness to pay for comprehensive health service package Birr 2271.7/year. Moreover, this study revealed loss-aversion bias, over-optimistic bias, and herding bias had significantly affected the household decision on community-based health insurance enrollment. The study suggests that behavioral biases affect Community-based health insurance enrollment. The study finding also reveals that respondent households are willingness to pay more for comprehensive health service package and for health insurance scheme that includes private health service providers. In addition, the study concludes eligible household enrollment decision varied based on their socio-demographic and household characteristic. This study recommends the need to consider mandatory community-based health insurance schemes and apply targeting intervention (coverage) to the particular group.
亚的斯亚贝巴社区健康保险登记和决定因素:来自行为经济学和离散选择实验的见解
以社区为基础的健康保险以农村和城市非正规部门的就业者为目标,通过分担风险和保护家庭在接受卫生设施服务时免于自付费用。然而,埃塞俄比亚以社区为基础的医疗保险计划的特点是入学率低。本研究的目的是从行为经济学和离散选择实验的角度分析亚的斯亚贝巴社区健康保险登记的决定因素。采用简单随机抽样方法,选取10个试点地区共222户家庭进行研究。一个简单的社会实验被用来检验行为偏差的重要性。对三个属性进行离散选择实验,并使用条件logit模型来确定所选属性的相对重要性和为这些属性付费的意愿。此外,利用二元logit回归模型估计社区医疗保险家庭参保概率。研究结果表明,与现状相比,家庭只愿意为私人保健服务提供者付费的意愿最高(每年1849.6比尔)。非成员家庭支付综合保健服务一揽子费用的意愿为每年2271.7卢比。此外,本研究还发现损失厌恶偏见、过度乐观偏见和羊群偏见显著影响了家庭参与社区健康保险的决策。研究表明,行为偏见影响社区健康保险的登记。研究结果还表明,受访者家庭愿意为综合医疗服务套餐和包括私人医疗服务提供者在内的医疗保险计划支付更多费用。此外,研究还发现,符合条件的家庭入学决策因其社会人口特征和家庭特征而有所不同。本研究建议有必要考虑强制性社区健康保险计划,并对特定群体实施有针对性的干预(覆盖)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信