Interpretation and application of Article 31(4) of the Constitution

Kiho Noh
{"title":"Interpretation and application of Article 31(4) of the Constitution","authors":"Kiho Noh","doi":"10.22397/wlri.2023.39.1.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 31, Paragraph 4 of the current Constitution stipulates that “the independence, professionalism, political neutrality of education and the autonomy of universities are guaranteed by the law.” As for the content and scope of what the “autonomy of education, professionalism, political neutrality, and university autonomy” in the Constitution means in detail, the theories that have been established in Article 31, Paragraph 4 are insufficient, and the application of this provision is not yet complete. There are also not many precedents of specific cases throughpolitical neutrality of education and the autonomy of universities are guaranteed by the law.” As for the content and scope of what the “autonomy of education, professionalism, political neutrality, and university autonomy” in the Constitution means in detail, the theories that have been established in Article 31, Paragraph 4 are insufficient, and the application of this provision is not yet complete. There are also not many precedents of specific cases through. Therefore, in this thesis, the concept and meaning of education's autonomy, professionalism, and political neutrality, and specific examples of application were examined, and how they are defined in Japanese education laws, which have similar regulations to ours, and how they are defined in academic theories, theories, and specific precedents. I tried to get implications by comparing and examining whether they are interpreting. And furthermore, we reviewed what is the plan to solve our educational legal issues. It can be said that the concept and meaning of the autonomy of education, professionalism, political neutrality, and university autonomy under Article 31, Paragraph 4 of the Constitution, as well as specific implementation plans, have been established to some extent through academic theories and court precedents. However, if the constitutional purpose of Article 31, Section 4 of the Constitution is interpreted with respect and the legislative purpose of the constitutional authority is respected, it can be said that it ultimately results in the substantial guarantee of the people's right to receive education under Article 31, Section 1 of the Constitution. In order to more practically and concretely realize the people's right to receive education, and narrowly, the student's right to learn, autonomy, professionalism, and political neutrality in education are required. It should be seen that it is implemented as (autonomy). It is necessary for the government to reflect the legislative intent of the Constitution when designing education policies and establishing a system, and the same is true for the courts to interpret and apply the provisions of education.","PeriodicalId":430360,"journal":{"name":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22397/wlri.2023.39.1.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article 31, Paragraph 4 of the current Constitution stipulates that “the independence, professionalism, political neutrality of education and the autonomy of universities are guaranteed by the law.” As for the content and scope of what the “autonomy of education, professionalism, political neutrality, and university autonomy” in the Constitution means in detail, the theories that have been established in Article 31, Paragraph 4 are insufficient, and the application of this provision is not yet complete. There are also not many precedents of specific cases throughpolitical neutrality of education and the autonomy of universities are guaranteed by the law.” As for the content and scope of what the “autonomy of education, professionalism, political neutrality, and university autonomy” in the Constitution means in detail, the theories that have been established in Article 31, Paragraph 4 are insufficient, and the application of this provision is not yet complete. There are also not many precedents of specific cases through. Therefore, in this thesis, the concept and meaning of education's autonomy, professionalism, and political neutrality, and specific examples of application were examined, and how they are defined in Japanese education laws, which have similar regulations to ours, and how they are defined in academic theories, theories, and specific precedents. I tried to get implications by comparing and examining whether they are interpreting. And furthermore, we reviewed what is the plan to solve our educational legal issues. It can be said that the concept and meaning of the autonomy of education, professionalism, political neutrality, and university autonomy under Article 31, Paragraph 4 of the Constitution, as well as specific implementation plans, have been established to some extent through academic theories and court precedents. However, if the constitutional purpose of Article 31, Section 4 of the Constitution is interpreted with respect and the legislative purpose of the constitutional authority is respected, it can be said that it ultimately results in the substantial guarantee of the people's right to receive education under Article 31, Section 1 of the Constitution. In order to more practically and concretely realize the people's right to receive education, and narrowly, the student's right to learn, autonomy, professionalism, and political neutrality in education are required. It should be seen that it is implemented as (autonomy). It is necessary for the government to reflect the legislative intent of the Constitution when designing education policies and establishing a system, and the same is true for the courts to interpret and apply the provisions of education.
宪法第31(4)条的解释和适用
现行宪法第31条第4款规定:“教育的独立性、专业性、政治中立性和大学的自主性受法律保障。”至于宪法规定的“教育自主、专业自主、政治中立、大学自治”的具体含义和范围,在第31条第4款中确立的理论是不够的,这一规定的适用还不完善。通过教育的政治中立性和大学的自治权得到法律保障,具体案例的先例也不多。”至于宪法规定的“教育自主、专业自主、政治中立、大学自治”的具体含义和范围,在第31条第4款中确立的理论是不够的,这一规定的适用还不完善。具体案例通过的先例也不多。因此,本文考察了教育自主性、专业性、政治中立性的概念、含义、具体应用实例,以及在与我国有类似规定的日本教育法中如何界定,以及在学术理论、理论和具体判例中如何界定。我试图通过比较和检查他们是否在解释来获得暗示。此外,我们还讨论了解决我国教育法律问题的方案。可以说,宪法第31条第4款所规定的教育自治、专业主义、政治中立、大学自治的概念和含义,以及具体的实施方案,已经通过学术理论和法院判例在一定程度上确立了。但是,如果尊重宪法第31条第4款的宪法目的,尊重宪法机关的立法目的,则可以说最终导致了宪法第31条第1款规定的人民受教育权的实质性保障。为了更实际、更具体地实现人民的受教育权,狭义地说,需要学生在教育中的学习权、自主权、专业性和政治中立性。应该把它看作是作为(自治)来实现的。政府在制定教育政策和建立制度时必须反映宪法的立法意图,法院在解释和适用教育条款时也应如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信