On the Evaluation of a Structural Information Metric for Syllabus Suitability

Anestis A. Toptsis, Jose Semidey
{"title":"On the Evaluation of a Structural Information Metric for Syllabus Suitability","authors":"Anestis A. Toptsis, Jose Semidey","doi":"10.1109/ICISA.2010.5480372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an evaluation of a method that can be used to gauge the suitability of a syllabus among several alternative syllabi for the same knowledge subject. The method can be useful in aiding to adopt a particular lesson plan for actual instruction, instead of adopting a lesson plan of unknown educational impact. Two limited knowledge areas are chosen from computer science and mathematics and our evaluation is done with human volunteers who have knowledge and (some) work experience with the tested knowledge areas. Our findings provide evidence that the tested method may serve as a viable approach for judging the suitability of alternative lesson plans.","PeriodicalId":313762,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Information Science and Applications","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Information Science and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISA.2010.5480372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present an evaluation of a method that can be used to gauge the suitability of a syllabus among several alternative syllabi for the same knowledge subject. The method can be useful in aiding to adopt a particular lesson plan for actual instruction, instead of adopting a lesson plan of unknown educational impact. Two limited knowledge areas are chosen from computer science and mathematics and our evaluation is done with human volunteers who have knowledge and (some) work experience with the tested knowledge areas. Our findings provide evidence that the tested method may serve as a viable approach for judging the suitability of alternative lesson plans.
论教学大纲适宜性的结构信息度量
我们提出了一种方法的评估,该方法可用于衡量同一知识主题的几个备选教学大纲之间的教学大纲的适用性。这种方法有助于在实际教学中采用特定的教案,而不是采用未知的教育影响的教案。从计算机科学和数学中选择了两个有限的知识领域,我们的评估是由具有被测试知识领域知识和(一些)工作经验的人类志愿者完成的。我们的研究结果提供了证据,证明测试方法可以作为一种可行的方法来判断替代课程计划的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信