{"title":"FRAND Commitments in Theory and Practice: A Response to Lemley and Shapiro's 'A Simple Approach'","authors":"Edward F. Sherry, D. Teece, P. Grindley","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2764615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We respond to a recent proposal by Profs. Lemley and Shapiro for compulsory binding final-offer (baseball-style) arbitration for disputes over licensing FRAND-commited standards-essential patents. We demonstrate that, contrary to their suggestions, their proposal is not \"best practices\" for any standards-setting organization and suffers from a number of practical and conceptual problems.","PeriodicalId":142986,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2764615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
We respond to a recent proposal by Profs. Lemley and Shapiro for compulsory binding final-offer (baseball-style) arbitration for disputes over licensing FRAND-commited standards-essential patents. We demonstrate that, contrary to their suggestions, their proposal is not "best practices" for any standards-setting organization and suffers from a number of practical and conceptual problems.