The Relationship between Second Liens, First Mortgage Outcomes, and Borrower Credit: 1996-2010

A. Leventis
{"title":"The Relationship between Second Liens, First Mortgage Outcomes, and Borrower Credit: 1996-2010","authors":"A. Leventis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2498532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To help inform the ongoing policy debate concerning the risks associated with second mortgages, the paper rigorously evaluates the effect of second liens on the performance of first mortgages. Using a dataset that combines credit bureau information with mortgage performance data, the statistical analysis separately quantifies the extent to which piggyback and subsequent second liens impacted loan default and prepayment likelihoods for first liens. In a simple direct comparison of first-lien outcomes, piggyback second liens are shown to have substantially increased mortgage default rates, while decreasing mortgage prepayment likelihoods. The results differ significantly, however, when the relative comparison group is altered and the analysis looks for a “residual” relationship (i.e., the control variables are changed in the statistical analysis). When first-lien outcomes are compared for borrowers with identical at-origination total equity and debt servicing obligations, the residual outcome differences tend to be minimal. Where material differences do exist, piggyback second liens tended to be associated with marginally worse outcomes for loans originated during the housing boom and slightly better outcomes for later years. With respect to subsequent second liens, models that evaluate the direct relationship between second liens and first-lien outcomes find a pronounced time trend. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the origination of a second lien generally signaled better subsequent performance for the associated first mortgage, most likely because only the most creditworthy borrowers were able to get such loans. By the mid-2000s, the overall signal associated with subsequent second liens became negative—i.e., the underlying first mortgages performed materially worse than others. An abrupt switch at the inception of the housing bust is then evident, however, as second-lien-burdened first mortgages then performed better again. Models that control for total net equity and borrower debt obligations, i.e., seek the residual relationship between outcomes and second liens, show a consistent positive relationship between outcomes and subsequent second liens, but also reveal an interesting evolution over time. The paper concludes with a comparison of time trends for various nonmortgage credit statistics—including nonmortgage loan balances, revolving credit utilization rates, and credit scores—for borrowers with and without second liens.","PeriodicalId":113000,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Mortgages (Sub-Topic)","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Mortgages (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2498532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

To help inform the ongoing policy debate concerning the risks associated with second mortgages, the paper rigorously evaluates the effect of second liens on the performance of first mortgages. Using a dataset that combines credit bureau information with mortgage performance data, the statistical analysis separately quantifies the extent to which piggyback and subsequent second liens impacted loan default and prepayment likelihoods for first liens. In a simple direct comparison of first-lien outcomes, piggyback second liens are shown to have substantially increased mortgage default rates, while decreasing mortgage prepayment likelihoods. The results differ significantly, however, when the relative comparison group is altered and the analysis looks for a “residual” relationship (i.e., the control variables are changed in the statistical analysis). When first-lien outcomes are compared for borrowers with identical at-origination total equity and debt servicing obligations, the residual outcome differences tend to be minimal. Where material differences do exist, piggyback second liens tended to be associated with marginally worse outcomes for loans originated during the housing boom and slightly better outcomes for later years. With respect to subsequent second liens, models that evaluate the direct relationship between second liens and first-lien outcomes find a pronounced time trend. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the origination of a second lien generally signaled better subsequent performance for the associated first mortgage, most likely because only the most creditworthy borrowers were able to get such loans. By the mid-2000s, the overall signal associated with subsequent second liens became negative—i.e., the underlying first mortgages performed materially worse than others. An abrupt switch at the inception of the housing bust is then evident, however, as second-lien-burdened first mortgages then performed better again. Models that control for total net equity and borrower debt obligations, i.e., seek the residual relationship between outcomes and second liens, show a consistent positive relationship between outcomes and subsequent second liens, but also reveal an interesting evolution over time. The paper concludes with a comparison of time trends for various nonmortgage credit statistics—including nonmortgage loan balances, revolving credit utilization rates, and credit scores—for borrowers with and without second liens.
第二留置权、第一抵押贷款结果和借款人信用之间的关系:1996-2010
为了帮助告知正在进行的关于第二抵押贷款相关风险的政策辩论,本文严格评估了第二留置权对第一抵押贷款表现的影响。使用将信用局信息与抵押贷款表现数据相结合的数据集,统计分析分别量化了附带和随后的第二留置权对第一留置权的贷款违约和提前还款可能性的影响程度。在对第一留置权结果的简单直接比较中,附带第二留置权显示出大幅增加抵押贷款违约率,同时降低抵押贷款提前还款的可能性。然而,当相对比较组被改变并且分析寻找“残差”关系(即,在统计分析中控制变量被改变)时,结果显着不同。当第一留置权结果与相同的初始总股本和偿债义务的借款人进行比较时,剩余的结果差异往往是最小的。在确实存在实质性差异的情况下,附带第二留置权往往与房地产繁荣时期发放的贷款的结果略微差一些有关,而在随后的几年里,贷款的结果则略好一些。对于随后的第二留置权,评估第二留置权和第一留置权结果之间直接关系的模型发现了明显的时间趋势。在20世纪90年代末和21世纪初,第二留置权的产生通常预示着相关第一抵押贷款的后续表现会更好,很可能是因为只有信誉最好的借款人才能获得此类贷款。到2000年代中期,与随后的第二留置权相关的整体信号变成了负面的。在美国,基础第一抵押贷款的表现明显差于其他抵押贷款。然而,房地产泡沫破裂之初的突然转变是显而易见的,因为第二留置权负担的第一抵押贷款随后又表现得更好了。控制净资产总额和借款人债务义务的模型,即寻求结果与第二留置权之间的剩余关系,显示结果与随后的第二留置权之间存在一致的正关系,但也揭示了一个有趣的随时间演变。论文最后比较了有和没有第二留置权的借款人的各种非抵押信贷统计数据的时间趋势,包括非抵押贷款余额、循环信贷利用率和信用评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信