Review: English Pastoral Music: from Arcadia to Utopia, 1900-1955. By Eric Saylor. University of Illinois Press, 2017.

Lisa Van Herpt
{"title":"Review: English Pastoral Music: from Arcadia to Utopia, 1900-1955. By Eric Saylor. University of Illinois Press, 2017.","authors":"Lisa Van Herpt","doi":"10.33391/jgjh.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English pastoral music has not been given the proper scholarly attention it deserves. It has been one of Eric Saylor’s academic objectives to draw scholarly attention to this repertoire. He has published articles on this topic before, but English Pastoral Music: from Arcadia to Utopia, 19001955 is the first recent major publication that takes musical pastoralism seriously and dives into its intricate subtleties. Music critics have often described pastoral music as sentimental, nostalgic, and escapist (Saylor 2017, 3). Moreover, they deemed it inappropriate and horribly out of fashion amid the tumultuous new developments of modernism, especially after the Second World War. Critics were, for instance, more interested in works written in serial and neoclassical idioms, which were perceived as being more progressive (ibid., 171-2). As a result, pastoralism is misunderstood; pastoral music evokes certain bucolic landscapes, whether in topic or musical style, but its manifestations and its composers’ motivations vary widely. Contrary to these misconceptions, pastoral music encompasses a variety of styles, idioms, timbres, forms, and signifiers, and has been subject to diverse influences. Moreover, its composers all had their own motives to write their pieces.","PeriodicalId":115950,"journal":{"name":"Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Junctions: Graduate Journal of the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33391/jgjh.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English pastoral music has not been given the proper scholarly attention it deserves. It has been one of Eric Saylor’s academic objectives to draw scholarly attention to this repertoire. He has published articles on this topic before, but English Pastoral Music: from Arcadia to Utopia, 19001955 is the first recent major publication that takes musical pastoralism seriously and dives into its intricate subtleties. Music critics have often described pastoral music as sentimental, nostalgic, and escapist (Saylor 2017, 3). Moreover, they deemed it inappropriate and horribly out of fashion amid the tumultuous new developments of modernism, especially after the Second World War. Critics were, for instance, more interested in works written in serial and neoclassical idioms, which were perceived as being more progressive (ibid., 171-2). As a result, pastoralism is misunderstood; pastoral music evokes certain bucolic landscapes, whether in topic or musical style, but its manifestations and its composers’ motivations vary widely. Contrary to these misconceptions, pastoral music encompasses a variety of styles, idioms, timbres, forms, and signifiers, and has been subject to diverse influences. Moreover, its composers all had their own motives to write their pieces.
回顾:英国田园音乐:从阿卡迪亚到乌托邦,1900-1955。埃里克·塞勒著。伊利诺伊大学出版社,2017。
英国的田园音乐还没有得到应有的学术关注。埃里克·塞勒(Eric Saylor)的学术目标之一是引起学术界对这一曲目的关注。他之前发表过关于这一主题的文章,但英国田园音乐:从阿卡迪亚到乌托邦,19001955是最近第一本严肃对待音乐田园主义并深入研究其复杂微妙之处的主要出版物。音乐评论家经常将田园音乐描述为感伤的、怀旧的和逃避现实的(Saylor 2017, 3)。此外,他们认为在现代主义的动荡发展中,尤其是在第二次世界大战后,田园音乐是不合适的,而且非常过时。例如,评论家们对用连载和新古典主义习语写成的作品更感兴趣,因为它们被认为是更进步的(同上,171-2)。因此,畜牧业被误解了;田园音乐无论是在主题上还是在音乐风格上都能唤起某些田园风光,但其表现形式和作曲家的动机却各不相同。与这些误解相反,田园音乐包含了各种风格、习语、音色、形式和能指,并受到了各种各样的影响。此外,它的作曲家都有自己的动机来写他们的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信