Battling for 'Openness'. Applying Situational Analysis to Negotiations Between Dutch Universities and Elsevier

Elena Simukovic
{"title":"Battling for 'Openness'. Applying Situational Analysis to Negotiations Between Dutch Universities and Elsevier","authors":"Elena Simukovic","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.56105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than a decade after the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) declaration, Open Access has become a widespread phenomenon and a dominant topic in the academic publishing world. Several large-scale developments can be currently observed including (trans-)national efforts towards ‘full Open Access’ in a given year or ‘offsetting’ models when renewing library subscriptions. In this context, the Netherlands are believed to play a pioneering role as novel agreements with major academic publishers have been recently reached and Open Access was set prominently among the priorities of the Dutch Presidency of the Council of the European Union in the first semester of 2016. However, the negotiations between Dutch universities and Elsevier could be rather described as an ongoing battle that only recently has taken ‘a constructive turn’. As a rich case for investigation, the controversy will be examined using Adele E. Clarke's (2005) method of situational analysis and subsequently visualized with three kinds of maps.","PeriodicalId":130180,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Electronic Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.56105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

More than a decade after the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) declaration, Open Access has become a widespread phenomenon and a dominant topic in the academic publishing world. Several large-scale developments can be currently observed including (trans-)national efforts towards ‘full Open Access’ in a given year or ‘offsetting’ models when renewing library subscriptions. In this context, the Netherlands are believed to play a pioneering role as novel agreements with major academic publishers have been recently reached and Open Access was set prominently among the priorities of the Dutch Presidency of the Council of the European Union in the first semester of 2016. However, the negotiations between Dutch universities and Elsevier could be rather described as an ongoing battle that only recently has taken ‘a constructive turn’. As a rich case for investigation, the controversy will be examined using Adele E. Clarke's (2005) method of situational analysis and subsequently visualized with three kinds of maps.
为“开放”而战。情境分析在荷兰大学与爱思唯尔谈判中的应用
在布达佩斯开放获取倡议(BOAI)宣布十多年后,开放获取已经成为学术出版界的一个普遍现象和主导话题。目前可以观察到一些大规模的发展,包括(跨国)国家在特定年份为“完全开放获取”所做的努力,或者在续订图书馆订阅时采用“抵消”模式。在此背景下,荷兰被认为扮演着先锋角色,因为最近与主要学术出版商达成了新的协议,并且开放获取在2016年第一学期荷兰担任欧盟理事会主席期间被列为优先事项之一。然而,荷兰大学和爱思唯尔之间的谈判可以被描述为一场持续的战斗,直到最近才有了“建设性的转变”。作为一个丰富的调查案例,我们将使用阿黛尔·e·克拉克(2005)的情境分析方法来研究这一争议,随后用三种地图进行可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信