Rhetorical Figure Detection: Chiasmus, Epanaphora, Epiphora

Marie Dubremetz, Joakim Nivre
{"title":"Rhetorical Figure Detection: Chiasmus, Epanaphora, Epiphora","authors":"Marie Dubremetz, Joakim Nivre","doi":"10.3389/fdigh.2018.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rhetorical figures are valuable linguistic data for literary analysis. In this article, we target the detection of three rhetorical figures that belong to the family of repetitive figures: chiasmus (I go where I please, and I please where I go.), epanaphora also called anaphora (“Poor old European Commission! Poor old European Council.”) and epiphora (“This house is mine. This car is mine. You are mine.”). Detecting repetition of words is easy for a computer but detecting only the ones provoking a rhetorical effect is difficult because of many accidental and irrelevant repetitions. For all figures, we train a log-linear classifier on a corpus of political debates. The corpus is only very partially annotated, but we nevertheless obtain good results, with more than 50% precision for all figures. We then apply our models to totally different genres and perform a comparative analysis, by comparing corpora of fiction, science and quotes. Thanks to the automatic detection of rhetorical figures, we discover that chiasmus is more likely to appear in the scientific context whereas epanaphora and epiphora are more common in fiction.","PeriodicalId":227954,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers Digit. Humanit.","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers Digit. Humanit.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2018.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Rhetorical figures are valuable linguistic data for literary analysis. In this article, we target the detection of three rhetorical figures that belong to the family of repetitive figures: chiasmus (I go where I please, and I please where I go.), epanaphora also called anaphora (“Poor old European Commission! Poor old European Council.”) and epiphora (“This house is mine. This car is mine. You are mine.”). Detecting repetition of words is easy for a computer but detecting only the ones provoking a rhetorical effect is difficult because of many accidental and irrelevant repetitions. For all figures, we train a log-linear classifier on a corpus of political debates. The corpus is only very partially annotated, but we nevertheless obtain good results, with more than 50% precision for all figures. We then apply our models to totally different genres and perform a comparative analysis, by comparing corpora of fiction, science and quotes. Thanks to the automatic detection of rhetorical figures, we discover that chiasmus is more likely to appear in the scientific context whereas epanaphora and epiphora are more common in fiction.
修辞格辨析:交错法、回指法、回指法
修辞格是文学分析的重要语言资料。在这篇文章中,我们的目标是检测三种属于重复修辞的修辞格:交错法(我去我喜欢的地方,我去我喜欢的地方),回指法也被称为回指法(“可怜的老欧盟委员会!可怜的欧洲理事会”)和顿悟(“这房子是我的。这辆车是我的。你是我的。”对于计算机来说,检测单词的重复很容易,但仅检测引起修辞效果的单词却很困难,因为有许多偶然和不相关的重复。对于所有人物,我们在政治辩论的语料库上训练一个对数线性分类器。语料库只有非常部分的注释,但我们仍然获得了很好的结果,所有数字的精度都超过50%。然后,我们将我们的模型应用于完全不同的体裁,并通过比较小说、科学和引用的语料库进行比较分析。由于修辞修辞的自动检测,我们发现交叉在科学语境中更容易出现,而在小说中更常见的是指回和表显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信