{"title":"SYSTEM PRODUCTS UK LTD v TRUSCOTT TERRACE HOLDINGS LLC","authors":"Appointed Person","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcz039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Registered designs – Validity – Bottle shapes – Novelty – Res judicata – Issue estoppel – Clarity of pleading – Whether ground now relied upon could and should have been raised in earlier proceedings – Whether sister companies were “privies” – Use of “Wayback Machine” evidence – Litigants without professional representation – Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcz039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
H1 Registered designs – Validity – Bottle shapes – Novelty – Res judicata – Issue estoppel – Clarity of pleading – Whether ground now relied upon could and should have been raised in earlier proceedings – Whether sister companies were “privies” – Use of “Wayback Machine” evidence – Litigants without professional representation – Appeal to Appointed Person