Resultados obtenidos con nefrolitotomía percutánea y su correlación con las escalas de Guy y S.T.O.N.E. en un hospital de la Ciudad de México

Q4 Medicine
J. Gómez-Sánchez, M. Cantellano-Orozco, J.G. Morales-Montor, G. Fernández-Noyola, C. Pacheco-Gahbler, V. Cornejo-Dávila, J.A. Herrera-Muñoz, D.A. Preciado-Estrella
{"title":"Resultados obtenidos con nefrolitotomía percutánea y su correlación con las escalas de Guy y S.T.O.N.E. en un hospital de la Ciudad de México","authors":"J. Gómez-Sánchez,&nbsp;M. Cantellano-Orozco,&nbsp;J.G. Morales-Montor,&nbsp;G. Fernández-Noyola,&nbsp;C. Pacheco-Gahbler,&nbsp;V. Cornejo-Dávila,&nbsp;J.A. Herrera-Muñoz,&nbsp;D.A. Preciado-Estrella","doi":"10.1016/j.uromx.2016.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a procedure with precise indications. An evaluation method for predicting the stone-free rate after PNL is needed. The Guy's stone score and the S.T.O.N.E. score are based on stone number and size, kidney anatomy, tract length, obstruction, the calyces involved, and Hounsfield units.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To evaluate the Guy's stone score and the S.T.O.N.E. score as stone-free rate predictors in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study of patients managed with PNL within the time frame of January 2013 to June 2015 was conducted. The Guy's stone score and the S.T.O.N.E. score were evaluated as stone-free rate predictors. Statistical analysis was done using the chi-square test (SPSS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-two patients were included, 10 women (45%) and 12 men (55%), and their mean age was 44 years. The stone-free rate was 63%. The Guy's stone score was correlated with a stone-free rate (<em>P</em>=.04), whereas the S.T.O.N.E. score had no relation (<em>P</em>=.7). The absence of ectasia was correlated with a higher stone-free rate (42%). Eighty-five percent of the patients without nephrostomy at the time of surgery resulted stone-free. Mechanical energy was the most widely utilized form of energy for lithotomy, being used in 45% of the patients. One renal pelvis perforation and bleeding were the complications that prevented the procedure from being finished, but transfusion was not required.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Correlation was found with the Guy's stone score, but there was no statistically significant difference in the S.T.O.N.E. score. The Guy's stone score had statistical value, but a greater number of patients are needed to increase the correlation of the 2 scores in our hospital.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34909,"journal":{"name":"Revista mexicana de urologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.uromx.2016.02.009","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista mexicana de urologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007408516300039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a procedure with precise indications. An evaluation method for predicting the stone-free rate after PNL is needed. The Guy's stone score and the S.T.O.N.E. score are based on stone number and size, kidney anatomy, tract length, obstruction, the calyces involved, and Hounsfield units.

Aim

To evaluate the Guy's stone score and the S.T.O.N.E. score as stone-free rate predictors in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Material and Methods

A retrospective study of patients managed with PNL within the time frame of January 2013 to June 2015 was conducted. The Guy's stone score and the S.T.O.N.E. score were evaluated as stone-free rate predictors. Statistical analysis was done using the chi-square test (SPSS).

Results

Twenty-two patients were included, 10 women (45%) and 12 men (55%), and their mean age was 44 years. The stone-free rate was 63%. The Guy's stone score was correlated with a stone-free rate (P=.04), whereas the S.T.O.N.E. score had no relation (P=.7). The absence of ectasia was correlated with a higher stone-free rate (42%). Eighty-five percent of the patients without nephrostomy at the time of surgery resulted stone-free. Mechanical energy was the most widely utilized form of energy for lithotomy, being used in 45% of the patients. One renal pelvis perforation and bleeding were the complications that prevented the procedure from being finished, but transfusion was not required.

Conclusions

Correlation was found with the Guy's stone score, but there was no statistically significant difference in the S.T.O.N.E. score. The Guy's stone score had statistical value, but a greater number of patients are needed to increase the correlation of the 2 scores in our hospital.

在墨西哥城一家医院,经皮肾石切开术的结果及其与Guy和S.T.O.N.E.量表的相关性
背景:经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)是一种有明确适应症的手术。需要一种预测PNL后无石率的评价方法。盖氏结石评分和S.T.O.N.E.评分是基于结石的数量和大小,肾脏解剖结构,尿路长度,梗阻,受累肾肾盏和霍氏单位。目的评价Guy's结石评分和S.T.O.N.E.评分作为经皮肾镜取石术中结石无结石率的预测指标。材料与方法回顾性研究2013年1月至2015年6月期间接受PNL治疗的患者。盖伊结石评分和S.T.O.N.E.评分被评估为无结石率的预测指标。统计学分析采用卡方检验(SPSS)。结果共纳入22例患者,其中女性10例(45%),男性12例(55%),平均年龄44岁。无石率为63%。Guy's结石评分与无结石率相关(P= 0.04),而S.T.O.N.E.评分与无结石率相关(P= 0.7)。没有扩张与较高的无结石率相关(42%)。在手术时没有做肾造口术的患者中,85%的患者没有结石。机械能是取石术中最广泛使用的能量形式,占45%的患者。一个肾盂穿孔和出血是阻止手术完成的并发症,但不需要输血。结论与Guy's stone评分存在相关性,但与S.T.O.N.E.评分差异无统计学意义。Guy’s stone评分具有统计学价值,但需要更多的患者来增加两者的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista mexicana de urologia
Revista mexicana de urologia Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Revista Mexicana de Urología (RMU) [Mexican Journal of Urology] (ISSN: 0185-4542 / ISSN electronic: 2007-4085) is bimonthly publication that disseminates research by academicians and professionals of the international medical community interested in urological subjects, in the format of original articles, clinical cases, review articles brief communications and letters to the editor. Owing to its nature, it is publication with international scope that disseminates contributions in Spanish and English that are rigorously reviewed by peers under the double blind modality. Neither journalistic documents nor those that lack rigorous medical or scientific support are suitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信