What Do Donors Want? Heterogeneity by Party and Policy Domain (Research Note)

David E. Broockman, Neil Malhotra
{"title":"What Do Donors Want? Heterogeneity by Party and Policy Domain (Research Note)","authors":"David E. Broockman, Neil Malhotra","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3288862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Influential theories indicate concern that campaign donors exert outsized political influence. However, little data documents what donors actually want from government; and existing research largely neglects donors’ views on individual issues. We argue there should be significant heterogeneity by party and policy domain in how donors’ views diverge from citizens. We support this argument with the largest survey of U.S. partisan donors to date, including an oversample of the largest donors. We find that Republican donors are much more conservative than Republican citizens on economic issues, whereas their views are similar on social issues. By contrast, Democratic donors are much more liberal than Democratic citizens on social issues, whereas their views are more similar on economic issues. Both parties’ donors are more pro-globalism than their citizen counterparts. We replicate these patterns in an independent dataset. These patterns can help inform significant debates about representation, inequality, and populism in American politics.","PeriodicalId":280037,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Legislation eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Legislation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3288862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Influential theories indicate concern that campaign donors exert outsized political influence. However, little data documents what donors actually want from government; and existing research largely neglects donors’ views on individual issues. We argue there should be significant heterogeneity by party and policy domain in how donors’ views diverge from citizens. We support this argument with the largest survey of U.S. partisan donors to date, including an oversample of the largest donors. We find that Republican donors are much more conservative than Republican citizens on economic issues, whereas their views are similar on social issues. By contrast, Democratic donors are much more liberal than Democratic citizens on social issues, whereas their views are more similar on economic issues. Both parties’ donors are more pro-globalism than their citizen counterparts. We replicate these patterns in an independent dataset. These patterns can help inform significant debates about representation, inequality, and populism in American politics.
捐赠者想要什么?政党和政策领域的异质性(研究说明)
有影响力的理论表明,人们担心竞选捐助者会施加过大的政治影响力。然而,很少有数据记录捐助者真正想从政府那里得到什么;现有的研究在很大程度上忽略了捐赠者对个别问题的看法。我们认为,在捐助者的观点与公民的观点分歧方面,政党和政策领域应该存在显著的异质性。我们用迄今为止对美国党派捐助者进行的最大规模调查来支持这一论点,其中包括对最大捐助者的抽样调查。我们发现共和党捐赠者在经济问题上比共和党公民保守得多,而他们在社会问题上的观点是相似的。相比之下,民主党捐助者在社会问题上比民主党公民开明得多,而他们在经济问题上的观点则更为相似。两党的捐款人都比他们的公民同行更支持全球化。我们在一个独立的数据集中复制这些模式。这些模式有助于为有关美国政治中的代表权、不平等和民粹主义的重大辩论提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信