Performace Evaluation of Similarity Metrics for Stereo Corresponce Problem

B. Khaleghi, S. Shahabi, A. Bidabadi
{"title":"Performace Evaluation of Similarity Metrics for Stereo Corresponce Problem","authors":"B. Khaleghi, S. Shahabi, A. Bidabadi","doi":"10.1109/CCECE.2007.397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lately, many promising stereo matching algorithms mostly relying on global energy minimization framework have been proposed which model disparity surface as a MRF and deploy various optimization techniques to produce a MAP approximation of MRF model corresponding to minimum energy level of the matching cost function. However, most of these methods mainly concentrate on how to minimize the cost function rather than attempting to improve its definition. We believe that regarding all advances made recently in cost function optimization area and also deeming results of some new experiments proving that even calculating the globally optimal solutions of energy minimization using re-weighted belief propagation approach does not solve most of the problems associated with common BP or GC based methods, the next logical step for further improvement is to devise cost functions which are better trimmed to cope with stereo matching major inherent problems. In this paper, we illustrate the importance of well-defined cost functions by incorporating six similarity measures, namely, Manhattan (LI), Euclidean (L2), Canberra, Bray-Curtis, Squared Chord and Square Chi-Squared into matching cost function and comparing the obtainable results. To accomplish this, we apply the test data and ground truth supplied on Middlebury college stereo webpage. Finally, we analyze the obtained results and discuss its impact on the design of enhanced matching cost functions.","PeriodicalId":183910,"journal":{"name":"2007 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2007.397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Lately, many promising stereo matching algorithms mostly relying on global energy minimization framework have been proposed which model disparity surface as a MRF and deploy various optimization techniques to produce a MAP approximation of MRF model corresponding to minimum energy level of the matching cost function. However, most of these methods mainly concentrate on how to minimize the cost function rather than attempting to improve its definition. We believe that regarding all advances made recently in cost function optimization area and also deeming results of some new experiments proving that even calculating the globally optimal solutions of energy minimization using re-weighted belief propagation approach does not solve most of the problems associated with common BP or GC based methods, the next logical step for further improvement is to devise cost functions which are better trimmed to cope with stereo matching major inherent problems. In this paper, we illustrate the importance of well-defined cost functions by incorporating six similarity measures, namely, Manhattan (LI), Euclidean (L2), Canberra, Bray-Curtis, Squared Chord and Square Chi-Squared into matching cost function and comparing the obtainable results. To accomplish this, we apply the test data and ground truth supplied on Middlebury college stereo webpage. Finally, we analyze the obtained results and discuss its impact on the design of enhanced matching cost functions.
立体对应问题相似度度量的性能评价
近年来,人们提出了许多基于全局能量最小化框架的立体匹配算法,以视差曲面为MRF模型,利用各种优化技术生成匹配代价函数最小能级对应的MRF模型的MAP逼近。然而,大多数这些方法主要集中在如何最小化成本函数,而不是试图改进它的定义。我们认为,考虑到最近在成本函数优化领域取得的所有进展,也考虑到一些新的实验结果证明,即使使用重新加权的信念传播方法计算能量最小化的全局最优解,也不能解决与普通BP或GC方法相关的大多数问题。进一步改进的下一个合乎逻辑的步骤是设计成本函数,以更好地处理立体匹配的主要固有问题。本文通过将Manhattan (LI)、Euclidean (L2)、Canberra、Bray-Curtis、Squared Chord和Square Chi-Squared六种相似性度量纳入匹配成本函数,并比较可获得的结果,说明了定义良好的成本函数的重要性。为了做到这一点,我们使用了明德学院立体声网页上提供的测试数据和实际情况。最后对所得结果进行了分析,并讨论了其对增强匹配代价函数设计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信