The relationship between withdrawal time and adenoma detection rate in a screening colonoscopy for medical check-up

Fumiaki Ishibashi, Tomohiro Kawakami, Konomi Kobayashi, Keita Fukushima, Ryu Tanaka, Kazuaki Sugihara, Y. Hayase
{"title":"The relationship between withdrawal time and adenoma detection rate in a screening colonoscopy for medical check-up","authors":"Fumiaki Ishibashi, Tomohiro Kawakami, Konomi Kobayashi, Keita Fukushima, Ryu Tanaka, Kazuaki Sugihara, Y. Hayase","doi":"10.7143/jhep.47.527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study included both people who underwent endoscopy and those who not. The result of fecal occult blood test enrolment. Patients patients inflammatory ABSTRACT Objective:Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between withdrawal time (WT) and quality indicators (Polyp Detection Rate (PDR), Adenomatous polyp Detection Rate (ADR), Mean number of Polyps found per Patient (MPP), and Mean Adenomatous polyp found per Patient (MAP)) in a screening colonoscopy for medical check-up. Methods:Methods: Endoscopic and pathological results were retrospectively reviewed for 840 colonoscopies performed by nine endoscopists at our facility between August and November 2018. ADR, PDR, MAP, and MPP were calculated and analyzed with WT at polyp identification (WT with polyp) or WT at polyp non-identification (WT without polyp). Results:Results: The mean WT without polyp was 6.56 minutes, the mean WT with polyp was 13.6 minutes, ADR was 23.9%, PDR was 29.3%, MAP was 0.35, MPP was 0.43, and the rate of early cancer (T1a) detection was 0.32%. Correlation analysis revealed a high correlation between WT without polyp and ADR, PDR, MAP, and MPP (R 2 =0.88, 0.92, 0.88 and 0.92, respectively). Regression analysis with WT without polyp as explanatory variables found each index to be signifi cantly predictive (ADR (P=0.0101), PDR (P=0.0005), MAP (P=0.0016), and MPP (P=0.0004)). Each index was found to be significantly improved when the cutoff value was 6.5 minutes of extraction time at polyp non-identification (ADR (35% vs 13.1%, P=0.0005), PDR (43% vs 15.7%, P=0.004), MAP (0.58 vs 0.17, P=0.006), and MPP (0.73 vs 0.2, P=0.001)). Conclusions:Conclusions: It was suggested that spending more than 6.5 minutes on whole colon observation may improve the rate of polyp detection.","PeriodicalId":150891,"journal":{"name":"Health Evaluation and Promotion","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Evaluation and Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7143/jhep.47.527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study included both people who underwent endoscopy and those who not. The result of fecal occult blood test enrolment. Patients patients inflammatory ABSTRACT Objective:Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between withdrawal time (WT) and quality indicators (Polyp Detection Rate (PDR), Adenomatous polyp Detection Rate (ADR), Mean number of Polyps found per Patient (MPP), and Mean Adenomatous polyp found per Patient (MAP)) in a screening colonoscopy for medical check-up. Methods:Methods: Endoscopic and pathological results were retrospectively reviewed for 840 colonoscopies performed by nine endoscopists at our facility between August and November 2018. ADR, PDR, MAP, and MPP were calculated and analyzed with WT at polyp identification (WT with polyp) or WT at polyp non-identification (WT without polyp). Results:Results: The mean WT without polyp was 6.56 minutes, the mean WT with polyp was 13.6 minutes, ADR was 23.9%, PDR was 29.3%, MAP was 0.35, MPP was 0.43, and the rate of early cancer (T1a) detection was 0.32%. Correlation analysis revealed a high correlation between WT without polyp and ADR, PDR, MAP, and MPP (R 2 =0.88, 0.92, 0.88 and 0.92, respectively). Regression analysis with WT without polyp as explanatory variables found each index to be signifi cantly predictive (ADR (P=0.0101), PDR (P=0.0005), MAP (P=0.0016), and MPP (P=0.0004)). Each index was found to be significantly improved when the cutoff value was 6.5 minutes of extraction time at polyp non-identification (ADR (35% vs 13.1%, P=0.0005), PDR (43% vs 15.7%, P=0.004), MAP (0.58 vs 0.17, P=0.006), and MPP (0.73 vs 0.2, P=0.001)). Conclusions:Conclusions: It was suggested that spending more than 6.5 minutes on whole colon observation may improve the rate of polyp detection.
筛查性结肠镜体检中退出时间与腺瘤检出率的关系
这项研究包括了接受内窥镜检查和没有接受内窥镜检查的人。粪便隐血试验结果入组。摘要目的:目的:探讨结肠镜筛查医学检查中息肉检出率(Polyp Detection Rate, PDR)、腺瘤性息肉检出率(Adenomatous Polyp Detection Rate, ADR)、平均每个患者发现息肉数(Mean of Polyps, MPP)和平均每个患者发现腺瘤性息肉数(Mean Adenomatous Polyp, MAP)与停药时间(WT)的关系。方法:回顾性分析2018年8月至11月9名内镜医生在我院进行的840例结肠镜检查的内镜和病理结果。计算并分析ADR、PDR、MAP和MPP,分别为息肉识别WT(有息肉)或息肉未识别WT(无息肉)。结果:无息肉的平均WT为6.56 min,有息肉的平均WT为13.6 min, ADR为23.9%,PDR为29.3%,MAP为0.35,MPP为0.43,早期肿瘤(T1a)检出率为0.32%。相关分析显示,无息肉WT与ADR、PDR、MAP、MPP呈高度相关(r2分别为0.88、0.92、0.88、0.92)。不含息肉作为解释变量的WT回归分析发现,每个指标(ADR (P=0.0101)、PDR (P=0.0005)、MAP (P=0.0016)和MPP (P=0.0004))都具有显著的预测作用。当未发现息肉的提取时间截止值为6.5 min时,各指标均有显著改善(ADR (35% vs 13.1%, P=0.0005)、PDR (43% vs 15.7%, P=0.004)、MAP (0.58 vs 0.17, P=0.006)、MPP (0.73 vs 0.2, P=0.001))。结论:结论:全结肠观察时间大于6.5 min可提高息肉的检出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信