Video Telehealth Increased During COVID-19 Pandemic Among VA Pulmonary Clinics, but Barriers Remain to Reaching Similar Levels of Use as Primary Care and Among High Risk Groups

M. Griffith, L. Donovan, L. Kelley
{"title":"Video Telehealth Increased During COVID-19 Pandemic Among VA Pulmonary Clinics, but Barriers Remain to Reaching Similar Levels of Use as Primary Care and Among High Risk Groups","authors":"M. Griffith, L. Donovan, L. Kelley","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a1730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RationaleThe COVID-19 pandemic has shifted care away from face to face encounters towards telephone and video telehealth. To accommodate this, the VA prioritized use of VA Video Connect (VVC) a software platform that connects providers with patients on their personal devices. As there may be factors particular to pulmonary or other specialty care clinics that are barriers or facilitators of VVC use, we wished to describe uptake of VVC in pulmonary clinics relative to a comparable specialty (cardiology) and primary care. We also sought to evaluate whether appropriate high-risk patient groups were being prioritized for VVC (e.g rural Veterans with limited access to VA services and older Veterans) to inform program development to facilitate wider expansion of this technology. MethodsWe collected data from the Veteran Health Administration Support Service Center (VSSC). We identified all encounters associated with a Pulmonary/Chest clinic location, Cardiology clinic, and Primary Care clinic. Among those encounters we identified all scheduled as VVC and sliced data by standard VA definitions of rurality. We compared use of VVC, as a proportion of total encounters, in September 2019 and September 2020 at the end of each fiscal year. As this study was hypothesis generating, we did not perform statistical testing though anticipate all differences would have been significant. Results We found that 0.02% of cardiology, 0.2% of pulmonary and 0.3% of primary care visits were conducted using VVC in 2019 and had increased to 6%, 6% and 14% respectively in 2020 (Table 1). During the pandemic, Veterans living in rural areas and highly rural were approximately half and one-quarter as likely to have a VVC encounter with a specialty clinic (cardiology or pulmonary) as Veterans in urban areas, respectively. Use of VVC was higher in primary care than specialty care clinics across rurality groups. Although use increased substantially across all age groups between 2019-20, it decreased with increasing age group across all three clinic types - with Veterans 85+y approximately half as likely to use VVC as Veterans 45-64y in both primary and specialty care. ConclusionsPrimary care use of video telehealth was higher than in specialty care clinics, potentially due to concerns about ability to examine and appropriately triage patients. Groups with limited access to hospital beds and at higher risk of severe complications of COVID infection were less likely to use VVC, suggesting targeted efforts are necessary to improve VVC use among high risk groups. .","PeriodicalId":159700,"journal":{"name":"TP20. TP020 TELEHEALTH AND REMOTE MONITORING FOR PULMONARY, CRITICAL CARE, AND SLEEP","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP20. TP020 TELEHEALTH AND REMOTE MONITORING FOR PULMONARY, CRITICAL CARE, AND SLEEP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a1730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RationaleThe COVID-19 pandemic has shifted care away from face to face encounters towards telephone and video telehealth. To accommodate this, the VA prioritized use of VA Video Connect (VVC) a software platform that connects providers with patients on their personal devices. As there may be factors particular to pulmonary or other specialty care clinics that are barriers or facilitators of VVC use, we wished to describe uptake of VVC in pulmonary clinics relative to a comparable specialty (cardiology) and primary care. We also sought to evaluate whether appropriate high-risk patient groups were being prioritized for VVC (e.g rural Veterans with limited access to VA services and older Veterans) to inform program development to facilitate wider expansion of this technology. MethodsWe collected data from the Veteran Health Administration Support Service Center (VSSC). We identified all encounters associated with a Pulmonary/Chest clinic location, Cardiology clinic, and Primary Care clinic. Among those encounters we identified all scheduled as VVC and sliced data by standard VA definitions of rurality. We compared use of VVC, as a proportion of total encounters, in September 2019 and September 2020 at the end of each fiscal year. As this study was hypothesis generating, we did not perform statistical testing though anticipate all differences would have been significant. Results We found that 0.02% of cardiology, 0.2% of pulmonary and 0.3% of primary care visits were conducted using VVC in 2019 and had increased to 6%, 6% and 14% respectively in 2020 (Table 1). During the pandemic, Veterans living in rural areas and highly rural were approximately half and one-quarter as likely to have a VVC encounter with a specialty clinic (cardiology or pulmonary) as Veterans in urban areas, respectively. Use of VVC was higher in primary care than specialty care clinics across rurality groups. Although use increased substantially across all age groups between 2019-20, it decreased with increasing age group across all three clinic types - with Veterans 85+y approximately half as likely to use VVC as Veterans 45-64y in both primary and specialty care. ConclusionsPrimary care use of video telehealth was higher than in specialty care clinics, potentially due to concerns about ability to examine and appropriately triage patients. Groups with limited access to hospital beds and at higher risk of severe complications of COVID infection were less likely to use VVC, suggesting targeted efforts are necessary to improve VVC use among high risk groups. .
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,VA肺部诊所的视频远程医疗有所增加,但在初级保健和高危人群中达到类似水平的使用仍然存在障碍
理由:2019冠状病毒病大流行已使护理从面对面接触转向电话和视频远程医疗。为了适应这种情况,VA优先使用VA视频连接(VVC),这是一种通过个人设备连接提供者与患者的软件平台。由于肺部或其他专科护理诊所可能存在阻碍或促进VVC使用的特定因素,我们希望描述肺部诊所相对于类似专科(心脏病学)和初级保健的VVC摄取情况。我们还试图评估是否将适当的高风险患者群体优先用于VVC(例如,获得VA服务有限的农村退伍军人和老年退伍军人),以告知项目开发以促进该技术的更广泛扩展。方法从退伍军人健康管理支持服务中心(VSSC)收集数据。我们确定了所有与肺科/胸科诊所、心脏病科诊所和初级保健诊所相关的病例。在这些遭遇中,我们确定了所有被安排为VVC的数据,并根据农村的标准VA定义进行切片。我们在每个财政年度结束时比较了2019年9月和2020年9月VVC的使用情况占总接触次数的比例。由于这项研究是假设生成的,我们没有进行统计检验,尽管预计所有的差异都是显著的。我们发现,2019年,0.02%的心脏病科、0.2%的肺科和0.3%的初级保健就诊是使用VVC进行的,到2020年这一比例分别增加到6%、6%和14%(表1)。在疫情大流行期间,生活在农村地区和高度农村地区的退伍军人在专科诊所(心脏病科或肺科)接受VVC就诊的可能性分别是城市地区退伍军人的一半和四分之一。在农村群体中,初级保健诊所使用VVC的比例高于专科护理诊所。尽管在2019- 2020年期间,所有年龄组的使用都大幅增加,但在所有三种临床类型中,随着年龄组的增加,使用VVC的人数减少——85岁以上的退伍军人在初级和专科护理中使用VVC的可能性大约是45-64岁退伍军人的一半。结论初级保健的视频远程医疗使用率高于专科护理诊所,可能是由于担心检查和适当分诊患者的能力。医院床位有限和COVID感染严重并发症风险较高的群体不太可能使用VVC,这表明有必要采取有针对性的努力,提高高风险群体的VVC使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信