A cross-sectional analysis of recommendations for company financial disclosure and auditing by nineteenth-century parliamentary witnesses

Jon T. Stewart
{"title":"A cross-sectional analysis of recommendations for company financial disclosure and auditing by nineteenth-century parliamentary witnesses","authors":"Jon T. Stewart","doi":"10.1080/09585209500000038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parker (1990) argues that nineteenth-century British legislators consciously differentiated between regulated industries on the one hand and commercial and industrial companies on the other when enacting relevant company accounting legislation. In drawing this distinction, Parker presents a challenging perspective for explaining the development of nineteenth-century companies legislation. Given the importance of the argument to a better understanding of the period, this study subjects Parker's ‘industry difference’ hypothesis to further investigation and testing. The disclosure and auditing recommendations of witnesses before eight major select committee investigations are compared and analysed. Statistically significant differences were observed across industries. While parliamentary witnesses tended to recommend more stringent disclosure legislation for regulated industries, no statistically significant differences in compulsory auditing recommendations were observed across industries. One explanation f...","PeriodicalId":252763,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Business and Financial History","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Business and Financial History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585209500000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Parker (1990) argues that nineteenth-century British legislators consciously differentiated between regulated industries on the one hand and commercial and industrial companies on the other when enacting relevant company accounting legislation. In drawing this distinction, Parker presents a challenging perspective for explaining the development of nineteenth-century companies legislation. Given the importance of the argument to a better understanding of the period, this study subjects Parker's ‘industry difference’ hypothesis to further investigation and testing. The disclosure and auditing recommendations of witnesses before eight major select committee investigations are compared and analysed. Statistically significant differences were observed across industries. While parliamentary witnesses tended to recommend more stringent disclosure legislation for regulated industries, no statistically significant differences in compulsory auditing recommendations were observed across industries. One explanation f...
19世纪议会证人对公司财务披露和审计建议的横断面分析
Parker(1990)认为,19世纪的英国立法者在制定相关的公司会计立法时,有意识地将受监管的行业与商业和工业公司区分开来。在描绘这种区别时,帕克提出了一个具有挑战性的视角来解释19世纪公司立法的发展。鉴于这一论点对更好地理解这一时期的重要性,本研究将帕克的“行业差异”假设纳入进一步的调查和检验。在八个主要特别委员会调查之前,证人的披露和审计建议进行了比较和分析。不同行业的数据差异有统计学意义。虽然议会证人倾向于建议对受监管行业制定更严格的披露立法,但在强制审计建议方面,各行业没有观察到统计学上的显著差异。的一种解释是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信