A Systematic Review of Usability Studies in Augmented Reality between 2005 and 2014

Arindam Dey, M. Billinghurst, R. Lindeman, J. Swan II
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Usability Studies in Augmented Reality between 2005 and 2014","authors":"Arindam Dey, M. Billinghurst, R. Lindeman, J. Swan II","doi":"10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review most AR papers published between 2005 and 2014 that include user studies. A total of 291 papers have been reviewed and classified based on their application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We also identify areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for future research. This poster describes the methodology of the review and the classifications of AR research that have emerged.","PeriodicalId":171967,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review most AR papers published between 2005 and 2014 that include user studies. A total of 291 papers have been reviewed and classified based on their application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We also identify areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for future research. This poster describes the methodology of the review and the classifications of AR research that have emerged.
2005年至2014年增强现实可用性研究的系统回顾
增强现实(AR)界面在过去的几十年里得到了广泛的研究,越来越多的基于用户的实验。在本文中,我们系统地回顾了2005年至2014年间发表的大多数AR论文,其中包括用户研究。根据应用领域对291篇论文进行了综述和分类。这篇综述的主要贡献是展示了基于用户的AR研究的广阔前景,并提供了这一前景如何变化的高层次观点。我们还确定了用户研究很少的领域,以及未来研究的机会。这张海报描述了审查的方法和已经出现的AR研究分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信