Rosetta Stone for Language Learning

G. Lord
{"title":"Rosetta Stone for Language Learning","authors":"G. Lord","doi":"10.17161/iallt.v46i1.8552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Rosetta Stone program advertises that it can teach language as effectively as, or even more effectively than, a typical classroom-learning environment. Little research has examined this claim, but as institutions are asked to cut costs and simultaneously embrace digital technologies, these programs are often considered as a possible solution to potentially replace teachers or other personnel. This exploratory multiple case study examines the claims and learning outcomes of the Rosetta Stone program among beginning Spanish learners to assess the effects of a semester-long treatment in which participants used Rosetta Stone as their class textbook or alone (instead of any class attendance), as compared to a control group. Data analysis focuses on learner outcomes in terms of linguistic production as well as their attitudes about the materials. Results reveal qualitative differences characterizing learners’ speech and strategies, as well as their reactions to the program. While continued investigation is needed, these initial results do not yet provide indication that the Rosetta Stone program, although possibly able to deliver success in some areas, would be capable of replacing the classroom language learning experience.","PeriodicalId":366246,"journal":{"name":"The IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/iallt.v46i1.8552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Rosetta Stone program advertises that it can teach language as effectively as, or even more effectively than, a typical classroom-learning environment. Little research has examined this claim, but as institutions are asked to cut costs and simultaneously embrace digital technologies, these programs are often considered as a possible solution to potentially replace teachers or other personnel. This exploratory multiple case study examines the claims and learning outcomes of the Rosetta Stone program among beginning Spanish learners to assess the effects of a semester-long treatment in which participants used Rosetta Stone as their class textbook or alone (instead of any class attendance), as compared to a control group. Data analysis focuses on learner outcomes in terms of linguistic production as well as their attitudes about the materials. Results reveal qualitative differences characterizing learners’ speech and strategies, as well as their reactions to the program. While continued investigation is needed, these initial results do not yet provide indication that the Rosetta Stone program, although possibly able to deliver success in some areas, would be capable of replacing the classroom language learning experience.
罗塞塔石碑语言学习
罗塞塔石碑项目宣传说,它可以像典型的课堂学习环境一样有效地教授语言,甚至比课堂学习环境更有效。很少有研究对这种说法进行检验,但随着机构被要求削减成本,同时接受数字技术,这些项目通常被认为是一种可能取代教师或其他人员的解决方案。本探索性多案例研究考察了罗塞塔石碑课程在西班牙语初学者中的主张和学习结果,以评估与对照组相比,参与者将罗塞塔石碑作为他们的课堂教科书或单独使用(而不是任何上课)的学期治疗的效果。数据分析侧重于学习者在语言生产方面的成果以及他们对材料的态度。结果揭示了学习者在语言和策略上的质的差异,以及他们对节目的反应。虽然需要继续进行调查,但这些初步结果尚未表明罗塞塔石碑项目虽然可能在某些领域取得成功,但能够取代课堂语言学习经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信