Husserl on Intentionality as an Essential Property of Consciousness

Liao Zhongwei
{"title":"Husserl on Intentionality as an Essential Property of Consciousness","authors":"Liao Zhongwei","doi":"10.3868/S030-003-014-0006-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the phenomenological tradition intentionality is considered to be an essential property of consciousness. Philosophers from this tradition (Brentano, Husserl, Sartre, etc.) generally share the following two commitments: (i) intentionality is an essential property of consciousness; and (ii) all intentional states are directed at, and are intentionally related to, objects. This view of consciousness has two pressing problems. Firstly, philosophers such as John Searle and David Rosenthal have suggested raw feelings and some forms of seemingly undirected and thus non-intentional feelings as counterexamples to the essential intentionality of conscious states. Secondly, some analytical philosophers and Husserlian scholars inspired by Frege, such as Smith and Follesdal, deny that every intentional state is related to a correlative object. This paper presents a Husserlian view concerning the essential intentionality of consciousness. It will be shown that both problems can be successfully dealt with from an essentially Husserlian and phenomenological perspective.","PeriodicalId":199616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Cognition","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S030-003-014-0006-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the phenomenological tradition intentionality is considered to be an essential property of consciousness. Philosophers from this tradition (Brentano, Husserl, Sartre, etc.) generally share the following two commitments: (i) intentionality is an essential property of consciousness; and (ii) all intentional states are directed at, and are intentionally related to, objects. This view of consciousness has two pressing problems. Firstly, philosophers such as John Searle and David Rosenthal have suggested raw feelings and some forms of seemingly undirected and thus non-intentional feelings as counterexamples to the essential intentionality of conscious states. Secondly, some analytical philosophers and Husserlian scholars inspired by Frege, such as Smith and Follesdal, deny that every intentional state is related to a correlative object. This paper presents a Husserlian view concerning the essential intentionality of consciousness. It will be shown that both problems can be successfully dealt with from an essentially Husserlian and phenomenological perspective.
胡塞尔论意向性是意识的本质属性
在现象学传统中,意向性被认为是意识的基本属性。来自这一传统的哲学家(布伦塔诺、胡塞尔、萨特等)一般都有以下两个承诺:(i)意向性是意识的本质属性;(ii)所有意向性状态都指向对象,并有意地与对象相关。这种意识观有两个紧迫的问题。首先,约翰·塞尔和大卫·罗森塔尔等哲学家提出,原始的感觉和某些形式的看似无方向的、因此是非有意的感觉,作为意识状态的基本意向性的反例。其次,受弗雷格启发的一些分析哲学家和胡塞尔学派学者,如史密斯和福勒斯达尔,否认每一个意向性状态都与一个相关对象有关。本文提出胡塞尔关于意识的本质意向性的观点。从胡塞尔和现象学的角度来看,这两个问题都可以成功地解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信