SLAVIC IDENTITY OF THE XIXth CENTURY UKRAINIAN HISTORIANS: CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE IMAGE OF “NATIVE” CIVILIZATON

I. Kutsyi
{"title":"SLAVIC IDENTITY OF THE XIXth CENTURY UKRAINIAN HISTORIANS: CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE IMAGE OF “NATIVE” CIVILIZATON","authors":"I. Kutsyi","doi":"10.30970/sls.2019.68.3072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Despite a significant interest of the Ukrainian scientists to the intellectual phenomena of the XIX th century, such an important worldview issue as Slavic identity was left beyond the researchers’ attention. This identity was represented by the majority of the Ukrainian intellectuals of the Romanticism (first half and middle of the XIXth century), mainly historians. Formation of the Ukrainian national movement as well as modern Ukrainian culture was in process under the conditions of spreading of this very form of civilizational self identification. This determines the actuality of our research. Purpose: The main aim of the paper is to outline the conceptual background of the Slavic identity and to analyze its genesis using the XIXth century Ukrainian historians’ scientific heritage as an example. Results: Slavic identity has been interpreted in the paper as identification of Ukraine and its historical past with the Slavic civilization, which was most often represented in the XIXth century historical texts by the notions Slavic world or Slovianshchyna. It meant to estimate historical and cultural phenomena applying the estimating scale “Slavic-nonslavic”. Anything in the Ukrainian cultural tradition estimated as “nonslavic” was automatically classified as “alien”. The Slavic identity was mainly formed as reaction to Eurocentrism of modern worldview principles. It was also an attempt of the intellectuals to overcome the cultural and civilizational inferiority complex of the Slavs. The intellectual and psychological paradox of the Slavic identity representatives’ was that they failed to completely overcome the Eurocentrism of their own worldview. The explanation of advantages of the Slavic nature was limited by the phrase “We are’nt any worse than Europe”. Being ideologically antieuropean, these intellectuals viewed Europe as a certain pattern or criterion for self estimation. Thus this identity failed to overcome the inferiority complex. Its opponents, the representatives of the European identity, were actively searching for an alternative formula for overcoming this complex. So this formula in the XXth century sounded already as following: “We, the Slavs, also belong to Europe”. The Slavic identity of the Ukrainian intellectuals of “the long XIXth century” as an intellectual and psychological phenomenon hasn’t been adequately studied, understood or popularized so far. Key words: Slavs, Slavic world, identity, historiography, civilization, orthodoxy, Europe.","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of slavonic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2019.68.3072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Despite a significant interest of the Ukrainian scientists to the intellectual phenomena of the XIX th century, such an important worldview issue as Slavic identity was left beyond the researchers’ attention. This identity was represented by the majority of the Ukrainian intellectuals of the Romanticism (first half and middle of the XIXth century), mainly historians. Formation of the Ukrainian national movement as well as modern Ukrainian culture was in process under the conditions of spreading of this very form of civilizational self identification. This determines the actuality of our research. Purpose: The main aim of the paper is to outline the conceptual background of the Slavic identity and to analyze its genesis using the XIXth century Ukrainian historians’ scientific heritage as an example. Results: Slavic identity has been interpreted in the paper as identification of Ukraine and its historical past with the Slavic civilization, which was most often represented in the XIXth century historical texts by the notions Slavic world or Slovianshchyna. It meant to estimate historical and cultural phenomena applying the estimating scale “Slavic-nonslavic”. Anything in the Ukrainian cultural tradition estimated as “nonslavic” was automatically classified as “alien”. The Slavic identity was mainly formed as reaction to Eurocentrism of modern worldview principles. It was also an attempt of the intellectuals to overcome the cultural and civilizational inferiority complex of the Slavs. The intellectual and psychological paradox of the Slavic identity representatives’ was that they failed to completely overcome the Eurocentrism of their own worldview. The explanation of advantages of the Slavic nature was limited by the phrase “We are’nt any worse than Europe”. Being ideologically antieuropean, these intellectuals viewed Europe as a certain pattern or criterion for self estimation. Thus this identity failed to overcome the inferiority complex. Its opponents, the representatives of the European identity, were actively searching for an alternative formula for overcoming this complex. So this formula in the XXth century sounded already as following: “We, the Slavs, also belong to Europe”. The Slavic identity of the Ukrainian intellectuals of “the long XIXth century” as an intellectual and psychological phenomenon hasn’t been adequately studied, understood or popularized so far. Key words: Slavs, Slavic world, identity, historiography, civilization, orthodoxy, Europe.
十九世纪乌克兰历史学家的斯拉夫身份:“本土”文明形象的概念化
背景:尽管乌克兰科学家对19世纪的智力现象非常感兴趣,但斯拉夫身份这样一个重要的世界观问题却没有引起研究者的注意。这种身份是由大多数乌克兰浪漫主义知识分子(19世纪上半叶和中期),主要是历史学家代表的。乌克兰民族运动和现代乌克兰文化的形成,正是在这种文明自我认同形式传播的条件下进行的。这决定了我们研究的现实性。目的:本文的主要目的是概述斯拉夫身份的概念背景,并以19世纪乌克兰历史学家的科学遗产为例分析其起源。结果:斯拉夫身份在论文中被解释为对乌克兰及其历史上与斯拉夫文明的认同,这在19世纪的历史文献中最常被斯拉夫世界或斯拉维什希纳的概念所代表。它的意思是用“斯拉夫-非斯拉夫”的估计尺度来估计历史文化现象。乌克兰文化传统中任何被认为是“非斯拉夫”的东西都被自动归类为“外来”。斯拉夫身份的形成主要是对现代世界观原则的欧洲中心主义的反应。这也是知识分子克服斯拉夫人文化和文明自卑情结的一次尝试。斯拉夫身份代表在思想和心理上的悖论是,他们未能完全克服自己世界观中的欧洲中心主义。对斯拉夫民族的优势的解释被“我们并不比欧洲差”这句话所限制。这些知识分子在意识形态上是反欧洲的,他们将欧洲视为自我评价的某种模式或标准。因此,这种认同未能克服自卑情结。它的反对者,即欧洲认同的代表,正在积极寻找克服这一复杂局面的替代方案。所以这个公式在20世纪听起来已经是这样的:“我们斯拉夫人,也属于欧洲”。“漫长的十九世纪”乌克兰知识分子的斯拉夫认同作为一种智力和心理现象,迄今尚未得到充分的研究、理解和推广。关键词:斯拉夫人,斯拉夫世界,认同,史学,文明,正统,欧洲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信