Self-triggered and event-driven control for linear systems with stochastic delays

S. Prakash, E. V. Horssen, D. Antunes, W. Heemels
{"title":"Self-triggered and event-driven control for linear systems with stochastic delays","authors":"S. Prakash, E. V. Horssen, D. Antunes, W. Heemels","doi":"10.23919/ACC.2017.7963411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delays are often present in embedded and networked control loops and represent one of the main sources of performance limitations. In this paper, we propose two aperiodic control strategies to optimize closed-loop performance in the presence of stochastic delays: (i) a self-triggered strategy, in which the deadline to drop data is decided on-line based on the current state; (ii) an event-driven strategy, whereby the control input is updated immediately after the delayed data becomes available, leading in general to faster but time-varying control loops. These schemes are designed and analyzed using a standard LQG framework, which allows for assessing and comparing closed-loop performance. We establish that our self-triggered strategy always achieves a better closed-loop performance than periodic control with an optimal sampling period. Moreover, we provide examples where the event-driven strategy outperforms the self-triggered strategy and examples where the opposite is observed.","PeriodicalId":422926,"journal":{"name":"2017 American Control Conference (ACC)","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 American Control Conference (ACC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2017.7963411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Delays are often present in embedded and networked control loops and represent one of the main sources of performance limitations. In this paper, we propose two aperiodic control strategies to optimize closed-loop performance in the presence of stochastic delays: (i) a self-triggered strategy, in which the deadline to drop data is decided on-line based on the current state; (ii) an event-driven strategy, whereby the control input is updated immediately after the delayed data becomes available, leading in general to faster but time-varying control loops. These schemes are designed and analyzed using a standard LQG framework, which allows for assessing and comparing closed-loop performance. We establish that our self-triggered strategy always achieves a better closed-loop performance than periodic control with an optimal sampling period. Moreover, we provide examples where the event-driven strategy outperforms the self-triggered strategy and examples where the opposite is observed.
随机时滞线性系统的自触发与事件驱动控制
延迟通常存在于嵌入式和网络化控制回路中,并且是性能限制的主要来源之一。在本文中,我们提出了两种非周期控制策略来优化存在随机延迟的闭环性能:(i)一种自触发策略,其中根据当前状态在线决定丢弃数据的截止日期;(ii)事件驱动策略,即在延迟数据可用后立即更新控制输入,通常导致更快但时变的控制循环。这些方案是使用标准LQG框架设计和分析的,该框架允许评估和比较闭环性能。结果表明,该自触发策略总是比具有最优采样周期的周期控制具有更好的闭环性能。此外,我们还提供了事件驱动策略优于自触发策略的示例,以及观察到相反情况的示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信