Team psychological capital and process improvement: an interactionist perspective

Dominic L. Marques, Caroline Aubé, Vincent Rousseau
{"title":"Team psychological capital and process improvement: an interactionist perspective","authors":"Dominic L. Marques, Caroline Aubé, Vincent Rousseau","doi":"10.1108/tpm-06-2022-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between team psychological capital (PsyCap) and team process improvement (TPI) by focusing on the mediating role of team self-managing behaviors (TSMBs) and the moderating effect of the team reward system.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData were collected from 514 members and their immediate superiors nested in 135 action teams working for a Canadian public safety organization. Hypotheses were tested using a path analytic procedure.\n\n\nFindings\nTeam PsyCap was positively related to TPI, and this relationship was mediated by TSMBs. In addition, the team reward system positively moderated the first stage of this relationship.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study highlights the important role that motivational factors play in the effectiveness of action teams. Specifically, the present study reveals that the psychological resources of action teams interact with the level of recognition and reward they receive to predict members’ engagement in self-managing behaviors and in improvement processes.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFindings suggest that to promote the capacity for process improvement of actions teams, managers should focus on their positive psychological resources, their capacity to self-manage and on the level of recognition and reward they receive.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nConsidering the dynamic and complex environments within which action teams operate, the finding that team PsyCap promotes their optimal functioning is particularly noteworthy. Furthermore, this study clarifies why and when team PsyCap enhances TPI.\n","PeriodicalId":150524,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-06-2022-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between team psychological capital (PsyCap) and team process improvement (TPI) by focusing on the mediating role of team self-managing behaviors (TSMBs) and the moderating effect of the team reward system. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 514 members and their immediate superiors nested in 135 action teams working for a Canadian public safety organization. Hypotheses were tested using a path analytic procedure. Findings Team PsyCap was positively related to TPI, and this relationship was mediated by TSMBs. In addition, the team reward system positively moderated the first stage of this relationship. Research limitations/implications This study highlights the important role that motivational factors play in the effectiveness of action teams. Specifically, the present study reveals that the psychological resources of action teams interact with the level of recognition and reward they receive to predict members’ engagement in self-managing behaviors and in improvement processes. Practical implications Findings suggest that to promote the capacity for process improvement of actions teams, managers should focus on their positive psychological resources, their capacity to self-manage and on the level of recognition and reward they receive. Originality/value Considering the dynamic and complex environments within which action teams operate, the finding that team PsyCap promotes their optimal functioning is particularly noteworthy. Furthermore, this study clarifies why and when team PsyCap enhances TPI.
团队心理资本与过程改进:互动主义视角
目的通过团队自我管理行为(TSMBs)的中介作用和团队奖励制度的调节作用,探讨团队心理资本(PsyCap)与团队过程改进(TPI)之间的关系。设计/方法/方法数据收集自514名成员和他们的直接上级,他们分布在加拿大公共安全组织的135个行动小组中。假设被检验使用路径分析程序。发现steam PsyCap与TPI呈正相关,这种关系是由tsmb介导的。此外,团队奖励制度正调节了这种关系的第一阶段。研究局限/启示本研究强调了激励因素在行动团队有效性中所起的重要作用。具体而言,本研究揭示了行动团队的心理资源与他们获得的认可和奖励水平相互作用,以预测成员在自我管理行为和改进过程中的参与程度。实践意义研究结果表明,管理者应关注行动团队的积极心理资源、自我管理能力和获得的认可和奖励水平,以提升行动团队的过程改进能力。考虑到行动团队运作的动态和复杂环境,团队PsyCap促进其最佳功能的发现尤其值得注意。此外,本研究阐明了PsyCap团队为何以及何时提高TPI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信