Roles of the 2007 Energy Industry Act in Supporting Peer-To-Peer Electricity Trading in Thailand: Issues to be Addressed by the 2004 Electricity Law of Vietnam

Piti Eiamchamroonlarp
{"title":"Roles of the 2007 Energy Industry Act in Supporting Peer-To-Peer Electricity Trading in Thailand: Issues to be Addressed by the 2004 Electricity Law of Vietnam","authors":"Piti Eiamchamroonlarp","doi":"10.2478/vjls-2022-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper analyzes the capability of the electricity licensing systems, together with the third-party access regime in Thailand and Vietnam and compares the two. It specifically studies the Energy Industry Act B.E. 2550 (2007) of Thailand (“Energy Industry Act of Thailand”) and the Electricity Law No. 28/2004/QH11 of Vietnam (“Electricity Law of Vietnam”) in enabling locally generated electricity traded on a peer-to-peer (P2P) basis, as well as the regulation of smart metering services. In summary, it finds that the Energy Industry Act of Thailand and the Electricity Law of Vietnam are functionally comparable. These two laws are both capable of serving as regulatory bases for P2P electricity trading among prosumers and other electricity users. However, to enhance readiness of the electricity regulatory regime for P2P renewable electricity trading among active and passive electricity-using customers, this paper suggests that in the future it would be wise for research be conducted to make clear whether a prosumer can simultaneously be an electricity-generating unit as well as an electricity-using customer. Importantly, it is necessary to answer whether a private power purchase agreement between prosumers and another electricity-using customer can be deemed as the permissible electricity trading forms under Article 20 paragraph 2 of the Electricity Law of Vietnam. In-depth analysis is needed to determine whether the electricity-generating unit’s right to connect, as well as under the Electricity Law of Vietnam can be evolvingly interpreted to include a right to “use” the electricity grids for “transporting” its self-generated renewable electricity. Finally, an important regulatory question to be addressed by the Electricity Law of Vietnam is whether rates and setting of wheeling service and related charges are subject to the regulatory scope of the Electricity Law of Vietnam.","PeriodicalId":403361,"journal":{"name":"Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/vjls-2022-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyzes the capability of the electricity licensing systems, together with the third-party access regime in Thailand and Vietnam and compares the two. It specifically studies the Energy Industry Act B.E. 2550 (2007) of Thailand (“Energy Industry Act of Thailand”) and the Electricity Law No. 28/2004/QH11 of Vietnam (“Electricity Law of Vietnam”) in enabling locally generated electricity traded on a peer-to-peer (P2P) basis, as well as the regulation of smart metering services. In summary, it finds that the Energy Industry Act of Thailand and the Electricity Law of Vietnam are functionally comparable. These two laws are both capable of serving as regulatory bases for P2P electricity trading among prosumers and other electricity users. However, to enhance readiness of the electricity regulatory regime for P2P renewable electricity trading among active and passive electricity-using customers, this paper suggests that in the future it would be wise for research be conducted to make clear whether a prosumer can simultaneously be an electricity-generating unit as well as an electricity-using customer. Importantly, it is necessary to answer whether a private power purchase agreement between prosumers and another electricity-using customer can be deemed as the permissible electricity trading forms under Article 20 paragraph 2 of the Electricity Law of Vietnam. In-depth analysis is needed to determine whether the electricity-generating unit’s right to connect, as well as under the Electricity Law of Vietnam can be evolvingly interpreted to include a right to “use” the electricity grids for “transporting” its self-generated renewable electricity. Finally, an important regulatory question to be addressed by the Electricity Law of Vietnam is whether rates and setting of wheeling service and related charges are subject to the regulatory scope of the Electricity Law of Vietnam.
2007年《能源工业法》在支持泰国点对点电力交易中的作用:2004年《越南电力法》要解决的问题
摘要本文分析了泰国和越南的电力许可制度以及第三方准入制度的能力,并对两者进行了比较。它具体研究了泰国能源工业法案B.E. 2550(2007)(“泰国能源工业法案”)和越南电力法第28/2004/QH11号(“越南电力法”),以实现本地发电在点对点(P2P)基础上的交易,以及智能计量服务的监管。综上所述,本文发现泰国的《能源工业法》和越南的《电力法》在功能上具有可比性。这两部法律都可以作为产消者和其他电力用户之间P2P电力交易的监管基础。然而,为了提高电力监管制度对主动和被动用电客户之间P2P可再生电力交易的准备程度,本文建议,在未来,明智的做法是进行研究,明确产消者是否可以同时是发电单位和用电客户。重要的是,有必要回答产消者和另一个用电客户之间的私人购电协议是否可以被视为越南电力法第20条第2款所允许的电力交易形式。需要深入分析,以确定发电单位的连接权,以及根据越南电力法,是否可以逐步解释为包括“使用”电网“运输”其自产的可再生电力的权利。最后,越南电力法要解决的一个重要监管问题是,轮转服务和相关费用的费率和设置是否属于越南电力法的监管范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信