From Utopian Dream to Dystopian Nightmare: A Protopian Response to A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court

Chander Shekhar, Smita Jha
{"title":"From Utopian Dream to Dystopian Nightmare: A Protopian Response to A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court","authors":"Chander Shekhar, Smita Jha","doi":"10.47836/pjssh.31.3.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the idea of protopia as propounded in Kevin Kelly’s The Inevitable (2016), which is anticipated in Mark Twain’s novel A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court (1889). Contrarily, Hank Morgan, the protagonist, feigns to achieve utopia, to secure power and privilege, not to realize utopia itself. However, Kelly’s suggestion of technology as the center of civilization takes us toward the state of protopia. Unfortunately, it is misused for mass extermination in the novel. Drawing critical insights from Fick, Hansen, Lieberman, Dobski, and Kleinerman, this article investigates the scope of protopian response through reader-response theory and attempts to highlight how Hank’s techno-politics (pure) is in resonation with Twain’s protopian vision. It further reveals how it is corrupted by practical politics (impure) for power and comfort, for which Twain criticizes Hank. This research provides a blueprint for thinking through and avoiding the abuses of technoscientific power that the novel so horrifically puts on display for future readers. It endeavors to unearth the protopian reading scope to re-read this dystopian novel as a narrative of progress. This paper argues that to achieve the quintessential goal of humanity, protopia appears to be an appropriate model since utopia is unachievable.","PeriodicalId":125431,"journal":{"name":"Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.3.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the idea of protopia as propounded in Kevin Kelly’s The Inevitable (2016), which is anticipated in Mark Twain’s novel A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court (1889). Contrarily, Hank Morgan, the protagonist, feigns to achieve utopia, to secure power and privilege, not to realize utopia itself. However, Kelly’s suggestion of technology as the center of civilization takes us toward the state of protopia. Unfortunately, it is misused for mass extermination in the novel. Drawing critical insights from Fick, Hansen, Lieberman, Dobski, and Kleinerman, this article investigates the scope of protopian response through reader-response theory and attempts to highlight how Hank’s techno-politics (pure) is in resonation with Twain’s protopian vision. It further reveals how it is corrupted by practical politics (impure) for power and comfort, for which Twain criticizes Hank. This research provides a blueprint for thinking through and avoiding the abuses of technoscientific power that the novel so horrifically puts on display for future readers. It endeavors to unearth the protopian reading scope to re-read this dystopian novel as a narrative of progress. This paper argues that to achieve the quintessential goal of humanity, protopia appears to be an appropriate model since utopia is unachievable.
从乌托邦梦到反乌托邦噩梦:对《亚瑟王宫廷里的康涅狄格美国佬》的原始回应
本文考察了凯文·凯利的《不可避免》(2016)中提出的原型国概念,马克·吐温的小说《亚瑟王宫廷里的康涅狄格美国佬》(1889)也预言了这一概念。相反,主人公汉克·摩根假装实现乌托邦,假装获得权力和特权,而不是假装实现乌托邦本身。然而,凯利关于技术是文明中心的建议将我们带向了原型状态。不幸的是,它在小说中被误用为大规模灭绝。本文借鉴了菲克、汉森、利伯曼、多布斯基和克莱纳曼的批判性见解,通过读者反应理论研究了原型反应的范围,并试图突出汉克的技术政治(纯粹)是如何与吐温的原型愿景产生共鸣的。它进一步揭示了它是如何被权力和舒适的实际政治(不纯粹)所腐化的,吐温为此批评了汉克。这项研究为思考和避免滥用科技力量提供了一个蓝图,而这正是小说如此可怕地向未来读者展示的。本文试图挖掘乌托邦式的阅读范围,将这部反乌托邦小说作为一种进步叙事重新解读。本文认为,要实现人类的基本目标,乌托邦似乎是一个合适的模式,因为乌托邦是无法实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信