La sinodalidad como elaboración conjunta de decisiones: salir del punto muerto del votum tantum consultivum

Álphonse Borras
{"title":"La sinodalidad como elaboración conjunta de decisiones: salir del punto muerto del votum tantum consultivum","authors":"Álphonse Borras","doi":"10.46553/teo.58.135.2021.p93-111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Church is synodal, which implies, from a participatory ecclesiology, the co-re- sponsibility of all the faithful. In this perspective, the qualification of the participatory bodies proposed by the Code of Canon Law as «only consultative» is problem- atic for a modern democratic sensibility. After evoking the anchoring of synodality in the mystery of the Church, the author recalls that this concept alludes both to a style, a habitus, and to processes and institutions that involve the protagonism of all the faithful as well as the singular role of the pastoral ministry. From there he concludes on the inadequacy of the juridical binomial \"consultative-deliberative\" to highlight both the ecclesiological weight of the common opinion and the equally ecclesiological relevance of the joint elaboration of decisions, in ecclesia.","PeriodicalId":386951,"journal":{"name":"Teología","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/teo.58.135.2021.p93-111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Church is synodal, which implies, from a participatory ecclesiology, the co-re- sponsibility of all the faithful. In this perspective, the qualification of the participatory bodies proposed by the Code of Canon Law as «only consultative» is problem- atic for a modern democratic sensibility. After evoking the anchoring of synodality in the mystery of the Church, the author recalls that this concept alludes both to a style, a habitus, and to processes and institutions that involve the protagonism of all the faithful as well as the singular role of the pastoral ministry. From there he concludes on the inadequacy of the juridical binomial "consultative-deliberative" to highlight both the ecclesiological weight of the common opinion and the equally ecclesiological relevance of the joint elaboration of decisions, in ecclesia.
作为联合决策的同步性:打破协商投票的僵局
教会是主教会议,这意味着,从一个参与教会,所有信徒的共同责任。从这个角度来看,《教会法典》提出的参与性机构的资格“仅是咨询性的”,这对现代民主感性来说是有问题的。在唤起教会奥秘中主教会议的锚定之后,作者回忆说,这个概念暗示了一种风格,一种习惯,以及涉及所有忠实信徒的主角以及牧灵部的单一角色的过程和机构。在此基础上,他总结了“协商-审议”这一司法二项式在强调共同意见的教会重要性和在教会内共同拟订决定的同样的教会相关性方面的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信