{"title":"Judgement","authors":"Gearold R. Johnson","doi":"10.1145/71539.71541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Judge William P. Gray's judgment dated February 6, 1989 is certainly the landmark legal decision concerning microprogramming and copyrightability. I know that many of you axe aware, through press coverage, of his decisions, but I thought you might be interested in reading in its entirety not only the judgment, but also the memorandum of decision that backs up his judgment. Therefore, I have attached copies of both of his documents. I have taken the liberty of retyping them to make them more compact for publication in our Newsletter. I hope that you find them interesting and thought provoking. Sigmicro has had numerous debates concerning legal issues surrounding microprogramming. Most of these debates were triggered by this case. We are planning to continue the discussion at Micro-22 in Dublin. I will summarize any conclusions for inclusion in the Sigmicro Newsletter following the Workshop.","PeriodicalId":138968,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigmicro Newsletter","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigmicro Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/71539.71541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Judge William P. Gray's judgment dated February 6, 1989 is certainly the landmark legal decision concerning microprogramming and copyrightability. I know that many of you axe aware, through press coverage, of his decisions, but I thought you might be interested in reading in its entirety not only the judgment, but also the memorandum of decision that backs up his judgment. Therefore, I have attached copies of both of his documents. I have taken the liberty of retyping them to make them more compact for publication in our Newsletter. I hope that you find them interesting and thought provoking. Sigmicro has had numerous debates concerning legal issues surrounding microprogramming. Most of these debates were triggered by this case. We are planning to continue the discussion at Micro-22 in Dublin. I will summarize any conclusions for inclusion in the Sigmicro Newsletter following the Workshop.
1989年2月6日,法官William P. Gray的判决无疑是关于微程序设计和版权的具有里程碑意义的法律决定。我知道你们中的许多人已经通过媒体报道了解了他的决定,但我认为你们可能有兴趣完整地阅读它不仅是判决,还有支持他的判决的判决备忘录。因此,我附上了他的两份文件的复印件。我冒昧地把它们重新打了一遍,使它们更紧凑,便于在我们的通讯中发表。我希望你觉得它们有趣,发人深省。Sigmicro围绕微程序设计的法律问题进行了多次辩论。这些争论大多是由这个案子引发的。我们计划在都柏林举行的Micro-22会议上继续讨论。我将总结任何结论,以便在研讨会之后的Sigmicro通讯中包含。