Improvization of conventional cytology by centrifuged liquid-based cytology in oral exfoliative cytology specimen

Shwetha Nambiar, V. Hegde, N. Yadav, K. Hallikeri
{"title":"Improvization of conventional cytology by centrifuged liquid-based cytology in oral exfoliative cytology specimen","authors":"Shwetha Nambiar, V. Hegde, N. Yadav, K. Hallikeri","doi":"10.4103/0970-9371.188045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Exfoliative cytology is the microscopic examination of shed or desquamated cells from the epithelial surface. Centrifuged liquid-based cytology (CLBC) is a modified technique that was used in the current study. Aims: To compare the efficacy of CLBC with conventional cytology in apparently normal mucosa after staining with Papanicolaou (PAP) stain. Materials and Methods: Fifty cases of apparently normal mucosa from healthy subjects were selected for the study. The first sample was taken and spread on the slide by the conventional technique. The second sample was flushed out in a suspending solution, centrifuged, and the cell pellet obtained was used to make the smear. The stained smears were compared for seven parameters such as adequate cellularity, clear background, uniform distribution, cellular overlapping, cellular elongation, mucus, and inflammatory cells. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis and P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between CLBC and conventional cytology with parameters such as adequate cellularity (P = 0.001), clear background (P = 0.001), uniform distribution (0.005), cellular overlapping, and cellular elongation (P = 0). The presence of mucus and inflammatory cells was minimal as the samples were collected from healthy subjects. Conclusion: CLBC has better efficacy over the conventional method in all the parameters analyzed.","PeriodicalId":182593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cytology / Indian Academy of Cytologists","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cytology / Indian Academy of Cytologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.188045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Exfoliative cytology is the microscopic examination of shed or desquamated cells from the epithelial surface. Centrifuged liquid-based cytology (CLBC) is a modified technique that was used in the current study. Aims: To compare the efficacy of CLBC with conventional cytology in apparently normal mucosa after staining with Papanicolaou (PAP) stain. Materials and Methods: Fifty cases of apparently normal mucosa from healthy subjects were selected for the study. The first sample was taken and spread on the slide by the conventional technique. The second sample was flushed out in a suspending solution, centrifuged, and the cell pellet obtained was used to make the smear. The stained smears were compared for seven parameters such as adequate cellularity, clear background, uniform distribution, cellular overlapping, cellular elongation, mucus, and inflammatory cells. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis and P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between CLBC and conventional cytology with parameters such as adequate cellularity (P = 0.001), clear background (P = 0.001), uniform distribution (0.005), cellular overlapping, and cellular elongation (P = 0). The presence of mucus and inflammatory cells was minimal as the samples were collected from healthy subjects. Conclusion: CLBC has better efficacy over the conventional method in all the parameters analyzed.
离心液基细胞学对口腔脱落性细胞学标本常规细胞学的改进
背景:剥脱细胞学是对上皮表面脱落或脱皮细胞的显微镜检查。离心液基细胞学(CLBC)是目前研究中使用的一种改良技术。目的:比较巴氏染色后表面正常粘膜的CLBC与常规细胞学检查的疗效。材料与方法:选取50例健康受试者表面正常的粘膜进行研究。取第一个样品,用常规方法铺在载玻片上。第二个样品在悬浮液中冲洗,离心,得到的细胞颗粒用于涂片。比较染色涂片的7个参数,如足够的细胞密度、清晰的背景、均匀的分布、细胞重叠、细胞伸长、粘液和炎症细胞。采用卡方检验进行统计学分析,以P≤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:CLBC与常规细胞学之间存在统计学上的显著差异,其参数包括足够的细胞密度(P = 0.001)、清晰的背景(P = 0.001)、均匀的分布(0.005)、细胞重叠和细胞伸长(P = 0)。由于样本来自健康受试者,黏液和炎症细胞的存在微乎其微。结论:CLBC法在各项指标上均优于常规方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信