Appendix II: Project Descriptions

Mizuko Ito, S. Baumer, Matteo Bittanti, D. Boyd, Rachel Cody, Becky Herr Stephenson, H. Horst, Patricia G. Lange, D. Mahendran, K. Martínez, C. J. Pascoe, Dan Perkel, Laura Robinson, Christo Sims, Lisa M. Tripp, Judd Antin, M. Finn, Arthur Law, Annie Manion, Sarai Mitnick, D. Schlossberg, S. Yardi
{"title":"Appendix II: Project Descriptions","authors":"Mizuko Ito, S. Baumer, Matteo Bittanti, D. Boyd, Rachel Cody, Becky Herr Stephenson, H. Horst, Patricia G. Lange, D. Mahendran, K. Martínez, C. J. Pascoe, Dan Perkel, Laura Robinson, Christo Sims, Lisa M. Tripp, Judd Antin, M. Finn, Arthur Law, Annie Manion, Sarai Mitnick, D. Schlossberg, S. Yardi","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/8402.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this appendix, we provide an overview of the research sites included in the Digital Youth Project. We have organized the sites into four general categories: homes and neighborhoods, institutional spaces, networked sites, and interest groups. While the categories are primarily organizational, they do help to emphasize the range of sites of inquiry that we draw upon for the analysis here—twenty distinctive research projects in total\n 1 \n—as well as the epistemology that shaped the ways we approached our effort to understand youth's engagement with new media from an ethnographic perspective. As is evident in our descriptions, many projects moved among different categories of research sites. For example, Lisa Tripp and Becky Herr-Stephenson's study of Los Angeles middle schools and Katynka Martinez's study of Pico Union families followed students at school and within their homes and neighborhoods. The points of intersection and divergence between the kids in the different studies were of great interest, such as when a researcher in the neighborhood cluster of studies discovered an anime fan, or conversely, when interest-based new media hobbies were notably absent among kids in a particular study. In this book, we describe practices that we observed in multiple case studies that emerged through collaborative analysis, and the specificities of the research sites and projects have largely been erased. In this appendix, we introduce the individual projects to provide the reader with some of the context that readers may feel is missing in previous chapters. Each study comprises an ethnographic analysis of new media in the lives of a particular population; taken as a whole, they offer a broader ecological perspective of how new media practices are distributed among diverse youth in diverse contexts.","PeriodicalId":244411,"journal":{"name":"Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8402.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this appendix, we provide an overview of the research sites included in the Digital Youth Project. We have organized the sites into four general categories: homes and neighborhoods, institutional spaces, networked sites, and interest groups. While the categories are primarily organizational, they do help to emphasize the range of sites of inquiry that we draw upon for the analysis here—twenty distinctive research projects in total 1 —as well as the epistemology that shaped the ways we approached our effort to understand youth's engagement with new media from an ethnographic perspective. As is evident in our descriptions, many projects moved among different categories of research sites. For example, Lisa Tripp and Becky Herr-Stephenson's study of Los Angeles middle schools and Katynka Martinez's study of Pico Union families followed students at school and within their homes and neighborhoods. The points of intersection and divergence between the kids in the different studies were of great interest, such as when a researcher in the neighborhood cluster of studies discovered an anime fan, or conversely, when interest-based new media hobbies were notably absent among kids in a particular study. In this book, we describe practices that we observed in multiple case studies that emerged through collaborative analysis, and the specificities of the research sites and projects have largely been erased. In this appendix, we introduce the individual projects to provide the reader with some of the context that readers may feel is missing in previous chapters. Each study comprises an ethnographic analysis of new media in the lives of a particular population; taken as a whole, they offer a broader ecological perspective of how new media practices are distributed among diverse youth in diverse contexts.
附录二:项目描述
在本附录中,我们概述了数字青年计划中包含的研究站点。我们将这些网站分为四大类:家庭和社区、机构空间、网络网站和兴趣团体。虽然这些分类主要是有组织的,但它们确实有助于强调我们在这里分析所利用的调查地点的范围——总共20个不同的研究项目——以及认识论,这些认识论塑造了我们从民族志的角度来理解年轻人与新媒体的接触的方式。正如我们的描述中所示,许多项目在不同类别的研究地点之间移动。例如,丽莎·特里普(Lisa Tripp)和贝基·赫尔-斯蒂芬森(Becky Herr-Stephenson)对洛杉矶中学的研究,以及卡廷卡·马丁内斯(Katynka Martinez)对Pico Union家庭的研究,跟踪了学生在学校、家庭和社区的情况。不同研究中孩子之间的交叉点和分歧点非常有趣,比如当邻里研究集群的研究人员发现一个动漫迷时,或者相反,当特定研究中的孩子明显缺乏基于兴趣的新媒体爱好时。在这本书中,我们描述了我们在多个案例研究中观察到的实践,这些案例研究是通过协作分析出现的,研究地点和项目的特殊性在很大程度上被抹去了。在本附录中,我们介绍了各个项目,为读者提供了一些读者可能会觉得在前几章中缺失的背景。每项研究都包括对新媒体在特定人群生活中的民族志分析;作为一个整体,它们提供了一个更广阔的生态视角,以了解新媒体实践如何在不同背景下的不同青年中分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信