Difficulties in reading and neuropsychological profile on WISC-IVin Italian children

D. Petretto, P. Piras, Ilenia Pistis, Elena Tradori, M. Camboni, Federica Staico, F. Palmas, Carla Lussu, A. Preti, C. Masala
{"title":"Difficulties in reading and neuropsychological profile on WISC-IVin Italian children","authors":"D. Petretto, P. Piras, Ilenia Pistis, Elena Tradori, M. Camboni, Federica Staico, F. Palmas, Carla Lussu, A. Preti, C. Masala","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA.2016.7533782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the born of intelligence tests, there have been a debate about the praticai use of intelligence tests, also with a lots of critics about the nature and the data we can derive from them. Perhaps the study of intelligence tests could be divided in different historical steps, in newer steps intelligence test were used and analyzed according to more detailed psychometrical bases and aiming to define specific profiles and to design specific intervention according to thus specific profiles. In current step, the single general index IQ is maintained but there is also a deeper analysis of single indexes and macroindexes according to a theorical framework. Wechsler Intelligence Scales are one of the worldwide more utilized tests for the assessment of general reasoning abilities and cognitive profile in children. In the last 20 years the CHC Model from Cattell-Horn and Carrol is the worldwide more utilized theoretical model for the analysis of abilities related to intelligence and pattern derived from intelligence test, supported by a great number of datasets. The interpretation of WISC-IV scores, based on CHC (Carrol-Horn-Cattell) model of intelligence, permit to evaluate single cognitive functions and to assess general reasoning competence as well as to describe verbal reasoning, visual spatial reasoning, working memory and speed of processing. New diagnostic criteria for dyslexia and for specific learning disabilities on reading from DSM-5 no more considered discrepancy criteria (a discrepancy between IQ and scores on reading test), but the assessment of neuropsychological profile and cognitive profile by intelligence test and other neuropsychological tests of the child remains an important phase of clinical evaluation ((1), (2), (3)). Different studies analyzed performance on WISC test in children with reading disorders from different countries (for example in France and Portugal), using different versions of the instrument (Wisc-r, Wisc-III, Wisc-IV) ((4), (5), (6) (7)) and also according to different criteria of selection (see (8) for persistent academic difficulties). The question about a dyslexic profile on the test is still open, perhaps due to different methodological choices in the different researches and to the use of different versions of Wechsler Scale for Children test. Purpose of this article is to describe performance on Wisc-IV test in Italian children, based on CHC model and to make a deeper analysis of cognitive profile, on single test level, and on indexes level. 168 children in the study were consecutively referred to the authors due to persistent academic difficulties and we selected 90 who have persistent difficulties related to reading (specific o unspecific) (from January 2013 to may 2014). Data on cognitive profile on single test level, and on indexes level are discussed, based on CHC model. Clinical issues are proposed, also aiming to the creation on personalized intervention, also in school.","PeriodicalId":221120,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2016.7533782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the born of intelligence tests, there have been a debate about the praticai use of intelligence tests, also with a lots of critics about the nature and the data we can derive from them. Perhaps the study of intelligence tests could be divided in different historical steps, in newer steps intelligence test were used and analyzed according to more detailed psychometrical bases and aiming to define specific profiles and to design specific intervention according to thus specific profiles. In current step, the single general index IQ is maintained but there is also a deeper analysis of single indexes and macroindexes according to a theorical framework. Wechsler Intelligence Scales are one of the worldwide more utilized tests for the assessment of general reasoning abilities and cognitive profile in children. In the last 20 years the CHC Model from Cattell-Horn and Carrol is the worldwide more utilized theoretical model for the analysis of abilities related to intelligence and pattern derived from intelligence test, supported by a great number of datasets. The interpretation of WISC-IV scores, based on CHC (Carrol-Horn-Cattell) model of intelligence, permit to evaluate single cognitive functions and to assess general reasoning competence as well as to describe verbal reasoning, visual spatial reasoning, working memory and speed of processing. New diagnostic criteria for dyslexia and for specific learning disabilities on reading from DSM-5 no more considered discrepancy criteria (a discrepancy between IQ and scores on reading test), but the assessment of neuropsychological profile and cognitive profile by intelligence test and other neuropsychological tests of the child remains an important phase of clinical evaluation ((1), (2), (3)). Different studies analyzed performance on WISC test in children with reading disorders from different countries (for example in France and Portugal), using different versions of the instrument (Wisc-r, Wisc-III, Wisc-IV) ((4), (5), (6) (7)) and also according to different criteria of selection (see (8) for persistent academic difficulties). The question about a dyslexic profile on the test is still open, perhaps due to different methodological choices in the different researches and to the use of different versions of Wechsler Scale for Children test. Purpose of this article is to describe performance on Wisc-IV test in Italian children, based on CHC model and to make a deeper analysis of cognitive profile, on single test level, and on indexes level. 168 children in the study were consecutively referred to the authors due to persistent academic difficulties and we selected 90 who have persistent difficulties related to reading (specific o unspecific) (from January 2013 to may 2014). Data on cognitive profile on single test level, and on indexes level are discussed, based on CHC model. Clinical issues are proposed, also aiming to the creation on personalized intervention, also in school.
意大利儿童WISC-IVin的阅读困难和神经心理特征
自从智力测验诞生以来,关于智力测验的实际应用一直存在争论,对智力测验的性质和我们可以从中获得的数据也有很多批评。也许智力测验的研究可以分为不同的历史阶段,在新的阶段,智力测验是根据更详细的心理测量学基础来使用和分析的,旨在定义特定的概况,并根据这些特定的概况设计特定的干预措施。当前阶段,在保持单项总体指标智商的基础上,对单项指标和宏观指标进行了较为深入的理论分析。韦氏智力量表是目前世界上比较常用的儿童一般推理能力和认知能力评估量表之一。在过去的20年里,cattel - horn和carroll提出的CHC模型是世界范围内使用较多的理论模型,用于分析与智力相关的能力和智力测试的模式,得到了大量数据集的支持。对WISC-IV分数的解释,基于CHC (carol - horn - cattell)智力模型,允许评估单一认知功能,评估一般推理能力,以及描述语言推理,视觉空间推理,工作记忆和处理速度。DSM-5中关于阅读障碍和特殊学习障碍的新诊断标准不再考虑差异标准(IQ和阅读测试分数之间的差异),但通过智力测试和其他神经心理测试对儿童的神经心理特征和认知特征的评估仍然是临床评估的重要阶段((1),(2),(3))。不同的研究分析了来自不同国家(例如法国和葡萄牙)的阅读障碍儿童在WISC测试中的表现,使用不同版本的工具(WISC -r, WISC - iii, WISC - iv)((4),(5),(6)(7)),并且根据不同的选择标准(见(8)对于持续学习困难)。关于测试中阅读障碍的问题仍然是开放的,可能是由于不同研究中不同的方法选择以及使用不同版本的韦氏儿童测试量表。本文的目的是描述意大利儿童在Wisc-IV测试中的表现,基于CHC模型,在认知概况、单测试水平和指标水平上进行更深入的分析。本研究中有168名儿童因持续学习困难而被连续转诊给作者,我们选择了90名患有持续阅读困难的儿童(具体的或非具体的)(2013年1月至2014年5月)。在CHC模型的基础上,讨论了单测试水平和指标水平上的认知概况数据。临床问题的提出,也旨在对个性化干预的创造,也在学校。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信