The Predictive Value of Abdominal Ultrasonography Compared to CT Scan for the Evaluation of Pediatric Lymphoma

Amirreza Jahanshahi, Amirataollah Hiradfar, Shabnam Mahboubi, A. H. Hosseinpour Feizi, Abolhassan Shakeri Bavil, Ali Mostafavijabbari, Hamid Reza Yousefi Nodeh, S. Raeisi
{"title":"The Predictive Value of Abdominal Ultrasonography Compared to CT Scan for the Evaluation of Pediatric Lymphoma","authors":"Amirreza Jahanshahi, Amirataollah Hiradfar, Shabnam Mahboubi, A. H. Hosseinpour Feizi, Abolhassan Shakeri Bavil, Ali Mostafavijabbari, Hamid Reza Yousefi Nodeh, S. Raeisi","doi":"10.18502/ijpho.v13i2.12337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Given the children's susceptibility to the harmful radiation of computerized tomography (CT) scans, ultrasonography can be a good alternative in staging pediatric lymphoma. The present study aimed to assess the predictive value of abdominal ultrasonography compared to CT scan in children with lymphoma. \nMaterials and Methods: Fifty-two children with confirmed lymphoma were included in the present cross-sectional analytical study and underwent CT scan. The staging was performed based on the involvement pattern, lymph nodes, liver involvement, spleen involvement, and lymph node sizes. Then, the patients underwent ultrasonography followed by re-staging. The data were analyzed by SPSS 26. p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. \nResults: The included patients consisted of 32 (61.5%) boys and 20 (38.5%) girls with the median age of 6.0 years (4.3-8.0). The number of the patients with positive paraaortic lymphadenopathy, iliac chain lymphadenopathy, mesenteric lymphadenopathy, increased liver size, changed liver parenchyma, increased spleen size, changed spleen parenchyma, increased kidney size, and changed kidney parenchyma evaluated by sonography and CT scan were 24 (46.2%) and 26 (50.0%), 3 (5.8%) and 3 (5.8%), 34 (65.4%) and 34 (65.4%), 49 (94.2%) and 48 (92.3%), 23 (44.2%) and 23 (44.2%), 45 (68.2%) and 21 (31.8%), 48 (92.3%) and 48 (92.3%), 50 (96.2%) and 50 (96.2%), and 49 (94.2%) and 48 (92.3%), respectively (p ≤ 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of abdominal ultrasonography staging compared to CT scan were 100%, more than 90%, more than 75%, and 100%, respectively. \nConclusion: Due to the sufficient sensitivity and specificity, ultrasonography has the potential to be applied instead of CT scan for the abdominal staging of pediatric lymphoma.","PeriodicalId":129489,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijpho.v13i2.12337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given the children's susceptibility to the harmful radiation of computerized tomography (CT) scans, ultrasonography can be a good alternative in staging pediatric lymphoma. The present study aimed to assess the predictive value of abdominal ultrasonography compared to CT scan in children with lymphoma. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two children with confirmed lymphoma were included in the present cross-sectional analytical study and underwent CT scan. The staging was performed based on the involvement pattern, lymph nodes, liver involvement, spleen involvement, and lymph node sizes. Then, the patients underwent ultrasonography followed by re-staging. The data were analyzed by SPSS 26. p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The included patients consisted of 32 (61.5%) boys and 20 (38.5%) girls with the median age of 6.0 years (4.3-8.0). The number of the patients with positive paraaortic lymphadenopathy, iliac chain lymphadenopathy, mesenteric lymphadenopathy, increased liver size, changed liver parenchyma, increased spleen size, changed spleen parenchyma, increased kidney size, and changed kidney parenchyma evaluated by sonography and CT scan were 24 (46.2%) and 26 (50.0%), 3 (5.8%) and 3 (5.8%), 34 (65.4%) and 34 (65.4%), 49 (94.2%) and 48 (92.3%), 23 (44.2%) and 23 (44.2%), 45 (68.2%) and 21 (31.8%), 48 (92.3%) and 48 (92.3%), 50 (96.2%) and 50 (96.2%), and 49 (94.2%) and 48 (92.3%), respectively (p ≤ 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of abdominal ultrasonography staging compared to CT scan were 100%, more than 90%, more than 75%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: Due to the sufficient sensitivity and specificity, ultrasonography has the potential to be applied instead of CT scan for the abdominal staging of pediatric lymphoma.
腹部超声与CT对小儿淋巴瘤的预测价值比较
背景:考虑到儿童对计算机断层扫描(CT)有害辐射的易感性,超声检查可以作为儿童淋巴瘤分期的一个很好的替代方法。本研究旨在评估腹部超声与CT扫描对儿童淋巴瘤的预测价值。材料与方法:本横断面分析研究纳入52例确诊淋巴瘤患儿,并行CT扫描。分期是根据受累模式、淋巴结、肝脏受累、脾脏受累和淋巴结大小进行的。然后,患者接受超声检查并重新分期。数据采用SPSS 26进行分析。p值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:纳入的患者中,男孩32例(61.5%),女孩20例(38.5%),中位年龄为6.0岁(4.3 ~ 8.0岁)。经超声和CT检查为主动脉旁淋巴结病、髂链淋巴结病、肠系膜淋巴结病阳性,肝大小增大、肝实质改变、脾大小增大、脾实质改变、肾大小增大、肾实质改变的患者分别为24(46.2%)和26(50.0%)、3(5.8%)和3(5.8%)、34(65.4%)和34(65.4%)、49(94.2%)和48(92.3%)、23(44.2%)和23(44.2%)、45(68.2%)和21(31.8%)。分别为48(92.3%)和48(92.3%),50(96.2%)和50(96.2%),49(94.2%)和48 (92.3%)(p≤0.001)。腹部超声分期与CT相比,敏感性100%,特异性90%以上,阳性预测值(PPV) 75%以上,阴性预测值(NPV) 100%。结论:超声检查具有足够的敏感性和特异性,有可能代替CT扫描用于小儿淋巴瘤的腹部分期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信