Relationship between Head Nurses’ Ethical Leadership and Demographic Characteristics with General Self-Efficacy of ICU Nurses in Educational-Treatment Centers of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, 2019

{"title":"Relationship between Head Nurses’ Ethical Leadership and Demographic Characteristics with General Self-Efficacy of ICU Nurses in Educational-Treatment Centers of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, 2019","authors":"","doi":"10.32592/ajnmc.30.2.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Ethical leadership has emerged as a new approach in the perspective of leadership and has provided a basis for the promotion of individual and organizational effectiveness by prioritizing ethics in the organization. This study aimed to determine the relationship between head nurses’ ethical leadership and demographic characteristics with the general self-efficacy of nurses working in Intensive Care Units (ICUs).\nMaterials and Methods: This descriptive correlational study was conducted in 2019 on 230 nurses working in ICUs of educational-treatment centers of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, who were selected using a stratified proportional sampling method. Data were collected by ethical leadership in nursing and the general self-efficacy scale of Scherer. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 16) through descriptive and inferential statistics.\nResults: There was no statistically significant association between the ethical leadership of head nurses and the general self-efficacy of nurses. The general self-efficacy of formal nurses was higher than contractual (P=0.04) and resident nurses (P=0.02), and the self-efficacy of ICU nurses was higher than those working in burn units (P=0.03). Moreover, general self-efficacy decreased with work experience (P<0.05). Considering the output of the artificial neural network, the normalized significance scores of the independent variables on the dependent variable were obtained at 100, 74.8, 56.2, 52, 47.6, 46.4, 38.1, 37.1, 27, and 13.3, for work experience, pioneering, task orientation, moralism, workplace, age, job status, gender, division of power, and education, respectively.\nConclusion: Considering the significant association between some demographic variables and the general self-efficacy of nurses, nursing managers are recommended to consider these variables, especially in retraining, to improve the general self-efficacy of nurses.","PeriodicalId":129048,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32592/ajnmc.30.2.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and Objective: Ethical leadership has emerged as a new approach in the perspective of leadership and has provided a basis for the promotion of individual and organizational effectiveness by prioritizing ethics in the organization. This study aimed to determine the relationship between head nurses’ ethical leadership and demographic characteristics with the general self-efficacy of nurses working in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). Materials and Methods: This descriptive correlational study was conducted in 2019 on 230 nurses working in ICUs of educational-treatment centers of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, who were selected using a stratified proportional sampling method. Data were collected by ethical leadership in nursing and the general self-efficacy scale of Scherer. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 16) through descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: There was no statistically significant association between the ethical leadership of head nurses and the general self-efficacy of nurses. The general self-efficacy of formal nurses was higher than contractual (P=0.04) and resident nurses (P=0.02), and the self-efficacy of ICU nurses was higher than those working in burn units (P=0.03). Moreover, general self-efficacy decreased with work experience (P<0.05). Considering the output of the artificial neural network, the normalized significance scores of the independent variables on the dependent variable were obtained at 100, 74.8, 56.2, 52, 47.6, 46.4, 38.1, 37.1, 27, and 13.3, for work experience, pioneering, task orientation, moralism, workplace, age, job status, gender, division of power, and education, respectively. Conclusion: Considering the significant association between some demographic variables and the general self-efficacy of nurses, nursing managers are recommended to consider these variables, especially in retraining, to improve the general self-efficacy of nurses.
哈马丹医科大学教育治疗中心护士长伦理领导、人口学特征与ICU护士一般自我效能的关系,伊朗哈马丹,2019
背景与目的:伦理领导作为一种新的领导方法而出现,并通过在组织中优先考虑伦理,为促进个人和组织的有效性提供了基础。本研究旨在探讨护士长伦理领导、人口学特征与重症监护病房护士一般自我效能的关系。材料与方法:采用分层比例抽样方法,于2019年对伊朗哈马丹医学大学教育治疗中心icu工作的230名护士进行描述性相关研究。采用护理伦理领导和谢勒一般自我效能感量表进行数据采集。数据分析采用SPSS (version 16)软件,采用描述性统计和推断性统计。结果:护士长伦理领导与护士总体自我效能感之间无统计学意义。正式护士的总体自我效能感高于合同制护士(P=0.04)和住院护士(P=0.02), ICU护士的自我效能感高于烧伤科护士(P=0.03)。总体自我效能感随工作经验的增加而降低(P<0.05)。考虑到人工神经网络的输出,自变量对因变量的归一化显著性得分分别为:100、74.8、56.2、52、47.6、46.4、38.1、37.1、27、13.3,分别为:工作经历、开拓性、任务导向、道德、工作场所、年龄、工作状态、性别、权力分工、教育程度。结论:考虑到某些人口统计变量与护士一般自我效能感之间存在显著相关性,建议护理管理者在再培训中考虑这些变量,以提高护士的一般自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信