On a more realistic lock contention model and its analysis

Alexander Thomasian
{"title":"On a more realistic lock contention model and its analysis","authors":"Alexander Thomasian","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.1994.283009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most performance modeling studies of lock contention in transaction processing systems are deficient in that they postulate a homogeneous database access model. The non-homogeneous database access model described in this paper allows multiple transaction classes with different access patterns to the database regions. The performance of the system from the viewpoint of lock contention is analyzed in the context of the standard two-phase locking concurrency control method with the general waiting policy. The approximate analysis is based on mean values of parameters and derives expressions for the probability of lock conflict (usually leading to transaction blocking) and the mean blocking time. The latter requires estimating the distribution of the effective wait-depth encountered by blocked transactions and the mean waiting time associated with different blocking levels. The accuracy of the analysis is validated against simulation results and also shown to be more accurate than analytic solutions considering only two levels of transaction blocking. Previously proposed metrics for load control have limited applicability for the model under consideration.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":142465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Engineering","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1994.283009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Most performance modeling studies of lock contention in transaction processing systems are deficient in that they postulate a homogeneous database access model. The non-homogeneous database access model described in this paper allows multiple transaction classes with different access patterns to the database regions. The performance of the system from the viewpoint of lock contention is analyzed in the context of the standard two-phase locking concurrency control method with the general waiting policy. The approximate analysis is based on mean values of parameters and derives expressions for the probability of lock conflict (usually leading to transaction blocking) and the mean blocking time. The latter requires estimating the distribution of the effective wait-depth encountered by blocked transactions and the mean waiting time associated with different blocking levels. The accuracy of the analysis is validated against simulation results and also shown to be more accurate than analytic solutions considering only two levels of transaction blocking. Previously proposed metrics for load control have limited applicability for the model under consideration.<>
一个较为现实的锁争用模型及其分析
大多数关于事务处理系统中锁争用的性能建模研究都存在不足,因为它们假设了同构的数据库访问模型。本文描述的非同构数据库访问模型允许具有不同访问模式的多个事务类访问数据库区域。从锁争用的角度分析了标准的两阶段锁并发控制方法和通用等待策略下的系统性能。近似分析基于参数的平均值,推导出锁冲突(通常导致事务阻塞)的概率和平均阻塞时间的表达式。后者需要估计阻塞事务遇到的有效等待深度的分布以及与不同阻塞级别相关的平均等待时间。根据仿真结果验证了分析的准确性,并且还显示比只考虑两层事务阻塞的解析解决方案更准确。以前提出的负荷控制指标对所考虑的模型的适用性有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信