Philosophy of Disability, Conceptual Engineering, and the Nursing Home-Industrial-Complex in Canada

Tremain
{"title":"Philosophy of Disability, Conceptual Engineering, and the Nursing Home-Industrial-Complex in Canada","authors":"Tremain","doi":"10.13169/intecritdivestud.4.1.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tremain the forefront of efforts increase the diversity of philosophy, with respect to employment of disabled philosophers, mentorship of disabled students, attention to critical philosophical work on disability. BIOPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, the philosophy blog that focuses on issues of underrepresentation in philosophy and which is home to Dialogues on Disability, the groundbreaking and critically acclaimed series of interviews that she conducts with disabled philosophers. ABSTRACT In this article, I indicate how the naturalized and individualized conception of disability that prevails in philosophy informs the indifference of philosophers to the predictable COVID-19 tragedy that has unfolded in nursing homes, supported living centers, psychiatric institutions, and other institutions in which elders and younger disabled people are placed. I maintain that, insofar as feminist and other discourses represent these institutions as sites of care and love, they enact structural gaslighting. I argue, therefore, that philosophers must engage in conceptual engineering with respect to how disability and these institutions are understood and represented. To substantiate my argument, I trace the sequence of catastrophic events that have occurred in nursing homes in Canada and in the Canadian province of Ontario in particular during the pandemic, tying these events to other past and current eugenic practices produced in the Canadian context. The crux of the article is that the COVID-19 pandemic has thrown into vivid relief the carceral character of nursing homes and other congregate settings in which elders and younger disabled people are confined.","PeriodicalId":224459,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/intecritdivestud.4.1.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Tremain the forefront of efforts increase the diversity of philosophy, with respect to employment of disabled philosophers, mentorship of disabled students, attention to critical philosophical work on disability. BIOPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, the philosophy blog that focuses on issues of underrepresentation in philosophy and which is home to Dialogues on Disability, the groundbreaking and critically acclaimed series of interviews that she conducts with disabled philosophers. ABSTRACT In this article, I indicate how the naturalized and individualized conception of disability that prevails in philosophy informs the indifference of philosophers to the predictable COVID-19 tragedy that has unfolded in nursing homes, supported living centers, psychiatric institutions, and other institutions in which elders and younger disabled people are placed. I maintain that, insofar as feminist and other discourses represent these institutions as sites of care and love, they enact structural gaslighting. I argue, therefore, that philosophers must engage in conceptual engineering with respect to how disability and these institutions are understood and represented. To substantiate my argument, I trace the sequence of catastrophic events that have occurred in nursing homes in Canada and in the Canadian province of Ontario in particular during the pandemic, tying these events to other past and current eugenic practices produced in the Canadian context. The crux of the article is that the COVID-19 pandemic has thrown into vivid relief the carceral character of nursing homes and other congregate settings in which elders and younger disabled people are confined.
加拿大的残疾哲学、概念工程和养老院-工业综合体
继续努力增加哲学的多样性,在雇用残疾哲学家,指导残疾学生,关注残疾哲学的批判性工作方面。“生物政治哲学”是一个哲学博客,关注哲学中代表性不足的问题,也是“残疾对话”的主页,这是她对残疾哲学家进行的一系列开创性和广受好评的采访。在这篇文章中,我指出了哲学中普遍存在的自然化和个性化的残疾概念如何告诉哲学家们对在养老院、支持生活中心、精神病院和其他安置老年人和年轻残疾人的机构中发生的可预见的COVID-19悲剧漠不关心。我坚持认为,只要女权主义者和其他话语将这些机构描述为关怀和爱的场所,它们就制定了结构性的煤气灯。因此,我认为,哲学家们必须参与概念工程,以了解残疾和这些机构是如何被理解和代表的。为了证实我的论点,我追溯了在加拿大养老院、特别是在大流行期间在加拿大安大略省养老院发生的一系列灾难性事件,并将这些事件与在加拿大背景下产生的其他过去和当前的优生做法联系起来。这篇文章的关键是,COVID-19大流行生动地揭示了养老院和其他聚集性场所的特点,这些场所限制了老年人和年轻残疾人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信