Sedation Quality of Low – Dose Ketamine Combined with Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol in Phacoemulsification under Local Anesthesia: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

Behzad Nazemroaya, Nima Koosha, Darioush Moradi Farsani, Ali Khosropour
{"title":"Sedation Quality of Low – Dose Ketamine Combined with Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol in Phacoemulsification under Local Anesthesia: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Behzad Nazemroaya, Nima Koosha, Darioush Moradi Farsani, Ali Khosropour","doi":"10.36351/pjo.v39i3.1629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:  To compare the hemodynamic effects of low-dose ketamine combined with dexmedetomidine versus propofol in phacoemulsification under local anesthesia.\nPlace and Duration of Study:  School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences during 2020-2021.\nMethods:  Sixty patients admitted for cataract surgery were included. Those with history of systemic diseases, insufficient pupil dilation, sensitivity to drugs and uncooperative patients were excluded. Participants were randomly allocated to two groups; group which was administered ketamine with dexmedetomidine (Ketodex) and group which was given ketamine with propofol (Ketofel). Effect on blood pressure, pulse and sedation was recorded.\nResults:  Mean age was 65 ± 9.9 years. Sixty-five were females. Ketodex increased the risk of hemodynamic disorders compared to Ketofel (P = 0.04). The risk of nausea and vomiting was higher in the Ketodex group although not significant. The effect of drug course on heart rate, blood pressure and sedation was significant in both groups (P < 0.05). Neither at baseline, nor in the 1st and 5th minutes of surgery, was the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significantly different between the two groups. From 10th minute of surgery until the end of surgery and from the beginning of recovery until the 30th minute of recovery, the MAP and pulse rate were higher in Ketofol group. Sedation effect during surgery was higher in the Ketodex group compared to the Ketofol group, and the difference was statistically significant at minutes 10, 20 and 30 of surgery.\nConclusion:  There is higher effect of sedation and fewer side effects of ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination compared to the ketamine-propofol combination.","PeriodicalId":169886,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v39i3.1629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:  To compare the hemodynamic effects of low-dose ketamine combined with dexmedetomidine versus propofol in phacoemulsification under local anesthesia. Place and Duration of Study:  School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences during 2020-2021. Methods:  Sixty patients admitted for cataract surgery were included. Those with history of systemic diseases, insufficient pupil dilation, sensitivity to drugs and uncooperative patients were excluded. Participants were randomly allocated to two groups; group which was administered ketamine with dexmedetomidine (Ketodex) and group which was given ketamine with propofol (Ketofel). Effect on blood pressure, pulse and sedation was recorded. Results:  Mean age was 65 ± 9.9 years. Sixty-five were females. Ketodex increased the risk of hemodynamic disorders compared to Ketofel (P = 0.04). The risk of nausea and vomiting was higher in the Ketodex group although not significant. The effect of drug course on heart rate, blood pressure and sedation was significant in both groups (P < 0.05). Neither at baseline, nor in the 1st and 5th minutes of surgery, was the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significantly different between the two groups. From 10th minute of surgery until the end of surgery and from the beginning of recovery until the 30th minute of recovery, the MAP and pulse rate were higher in Ketofol group. Sedation effect during surgery was higher in the Ketodex group compared to the Ketofol group, and the difference was statistically significant at minutes 10, 20 and 30 of surgery. Conclusion:  There is higher effect of sedation and fewer side effects of ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination compared to the ketamine-propofol combination.
小剂量氯胺酮联合右美托咪定与异丙酚在局麻超声乳化术中的镇静效果:一项三盲随机临床试验
目的:比较局麻下低剂量氯胺酮联合右美托咪定与异丙酚在超声乳化术中的血流动力学影响。学习地点和时间:2020-2021年在伊斯法罕医科大学医学院学习。方法:对60例白内障手术患者进行回顾性分析。排除有全身性疾病史、瞳孔扩张不足、药物敏感及不配合的患者。参与者被随机分为两组;氯胺酮与右美托咪定(Ketodex)联合用药组和氯胺酮与异丙酚(Ketofel)联合用药组。记录对血压、脉搏及镇静的影响。结果:平均年龄65±9.9岁。65名女性。与Ketofel相比,Ketodex增加了血液动力学障碍的风险(P = 0.04)。Ketodex组出现恶心和呕吐的风险较高,但并不显著。用药疗程对两组患者心率、血压及镇静作用的影响均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组在基线、手术第1分钟和第5分钟的平均动脉压(MAP)均无显著差异。从手术第10分钟到手术结束,从恢复开始到恢复第30分钟,酮fol组MAP和脉搏率较高。术中镇静效果Ketodex组高于Ketofol组,且在手术第10、20、30分钟时差异有统计学意义。结论:氯胺酮-右美托咪定联用较氯胺酮-异丙酚联用镇静效果好,副作用少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信