Section 2. Sun and standardization wars

ACM Stand. Pub Date : 1997-12-01 DOI:10.1145/274348.274350
C. Cargill
{"title":"Section 2. Sun and standardization wars","authors":"C. Cargill","doi":"10.1145/274348.274350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"m Before it initiated the SMI PAS documentation, SMI participated in four major standardization activities—UNIX standardization, the Graphical User Interface (GUI) wars, IEEE 1754 activities, and the Windows Application Programming Interface (APIW) effort. In all of these activities Sun was a major protagonist, battling with or against major players in the IT industry. SMI’s experiences with its standardization initiatives provide a basis for understanding SMI’s dealings with the PAS, and why the PAS represents one organization’s response to the difficulties encountered in the formal (and informal) standardization process. This section of StandardView looks briefly at these four activities and tries to draw a somewhat sympathetic picture of the mindset of SMI management as they struggled with the need to standardize Java. significant player in much of SMI’s standardization history was the Open Software Foundation (OSF). OSF was created to, among other things, counter the Sun–AT&T alliance on SVR4 UNIX. In 1987 and 1988, Sun abandoned its BSD UNIX base and aligned with AT&T’s System 5, Release 4, agreeing to AT&T licensing terms and conditions. Other major vendors, including Digital, found AT&T’s proposed royalty scheme not in their business interests, and opted instead to create their own UNIX-like system, merging the best of BSD, SVR4, and CMU’s Mach systems. To create this software, HP, Dec, and IBM formed the OSF in 1988, with the creation of a competing and “open” operating system, OSF1, as one of its goals. Sun and AT&T immediately responded with the creation of UNIX International (UI), a consortium intended to provide “open development of the real UNIX,” based on SVR4. The UI consortium was to provide an independent arena for the future development of UNIX, away from AT&T’s control. The UNIX Consortia battles caused the spilling of innumerable gallons of printers ink, but did little to make the world safe for UNIX or OSF1. Both sides spent tremendous amounts of money proving that they, and not their competition, were the true “open system” (see the earlier section on “open systems”). This battle continued until 1994. The UNIX battles spawned other arguments, the most notorious the now largely forgotten Graphical User Interface (GUI) war. The war had dual—and innocent—beginnings. The first part of the story unfolds at MIT, where the X Window System was created in the mid-1980s. DEC, IBM, and HP all participated in furthering the X Window Systems technology, and eventually MIT realized that it had a possible gold mine. To capitalize on its relationship with its sponsors, MIT formed (in 1988) a memberfunded consortium (the MIT X Consortium, renamed the X Consortium in 1993). Because the MIT X Consortium was limited in its scope (by design), the three major participants asked their newly created consortium to create a viable windowing scheme using X technology around which they (the big three vendors) could coalesce. The idea was to provide both an API and GUI, or merely the Section 2. Sun and Standardization Wars","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/274348.274350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

m Before it initiated the SMI PAS documentation, SMI participated in four major standardization activities—UNIX standardization, the Graphical User Interface (GUI) wars, IEEE 1754 activities, and the Windows Application Programming Interface (APIW) effort. In all of these activities Sun was a major protagonist, battling with or against major players in the IT industry. SMI’s experiences with its standardization initiatives provide a basis for understanding SMI’s dealings with the PAS, and why the PAS represents one organization’s response to the difficulties encountered in the formal (and informal) standardization process. This section of StandardView looks briefly at these four activities and tries to draw a somewhat sympathetic picture of the mindset of SMI management as they struggled with the need to standardize Java. significant player in much of SMI’s standardization history was the Open Software Foundation (OSF). OSF was created to, among other things, counter the Sun–AT&T alliance on SVR4 UNIX. In 1987 and 1988, Sun abandoned its BSD UNIX base and aligned with AT&T’s System 5, Release 4, agreeing to AT&T licensing terms and conditions. Other major vendors, including Digital, found AT&T’s proposed royalty scheme not in their business interests, and opted instead to create their own UNIX-like system, merging the best of BSD, SVR4, and CMU’s Mach systems. To create this software, HP, Dec, and IBM formed the OSF in 1988, with the creation of a competing and “open” operating system, OSF1, as one of its goals. Sun and AT&T immediately responded with the creation of UNIX International (UI), a consortium intended to provide “open development of the real UNIX,” based on SVR4. The UI consortium was to provide an independent arena for the future development of UNIX, away from AT&T’s control. The UNIX Consortia battles caused the spilling of innumerable gallons of printers ink, but did little to make the world safe for UNIX or OSF1. Both sides spent tremendous amounts of money proving that they, and not their competition, were the true “open system” (see the earlier section on “open systems”). This battle continued until 1994. The UNIX battles spawned other arguments, the most notorious the now largely forgotten Graphical User Interface (GUI) war. The war had dual—and innocent—beginnings. The first part of the story unfolds at MIT, where the X Window System was created in the mid-1980s. DEC, IBM, and HP all participated in furthering the X Window Systems technology, and eventually MIT realized that it had a possible gold mine. To capitalize on its relationship with its sponsors, MIT formed (in 1988) a memberfunded consortium (the MIT X Consortium, renamed the X Consortium in 1993). Because the MIT X Consortium was limited in its scope (by design), the three major participants asked their newly created consortium to create a viable windowing scheme using X technology around which they (the big three vendors) could coalesce. The idea was to provide both an API and GUI, or merely the Section 2. Sun and Standardization Wars
第二节。太阳与标准化之战
在发起SMI PAS文档之前,SMI参与了四个主要的标准化活动——unix标准化、图形用户界面(GUI)之战、IEEE 1754活动和Windows应用程序编程接口(APIW)工作。在所有这些活动中,Sun都是主要的主角,与IT行业的主要参与者竞争或对抗。SMI在标准化方面的经验为理解SMI与PAS的处理提供了基础,以及为什么PAS代表了一个组织对正式(和非正式)标准化过程中遇到的困难的响应。StandardView的这一部分简要介绍了这四种活动,并试图描绘出SMI管理人员在努力实现Java标准化时的心态。开放软件基金会(OSF)是SMI标准化历史中的重要参与者。OSF的创建,除其他外,是为了对抗SVR4 UNIX上的Sun-AT&T联盟。在1987年和1988年,Sun放弃了它的BSD UNIX基础,与AT&T的System 5, Release 4保持一致,同意AT&T的许可条款和条件。其他主要的供应商,包括Digital,发现AT&T提出的版税方案不符合他们的商业利益,并选择创建自己的类unix系统,合并最好的BSD、SVR4和CMU的Mach系统。为了创建这个软件,HP、Dec和IBM在1988年成立了OSF,其目标之一是创建一个竞争性的“开放”操作系统OSF1。Sun和AT&T立即做出了回应,创建了UNIX International (UI),这是一个旨在提供基于SVR4的“真正UNIX的开放开发”的联盟。UI联盟的目的是为UNIX的未来发展提供一个独立的平台,不受AT&T的控制。UNIX联盟之战导致了无数加仑打印机墨水的溢出,但却没有为UNIX或OSF1的安全做出什么贡献。双方都花了大量的钱来证明他们自己,而不是他们的竞争对手,才是真正的“开放系统”(参见前面关于“开放系统”的部分)。这场战斗一直持续到1994年。UNIX之战还引发了其他争论,其中最臭名昭著的是图形用户界面(GUI)之战,现在基本上已经被遗忘了。这场战争有两个起因,而且是无辜的。故事的第一部分是在麻省理工学院展开的,X窗口系统是在20世纪80年代中期创建的。DEC、IBM和惠普都参与了X窗口系统技术的进一步发展,最终麻省理工学院意识到这可能是一座金矿。为了充分利用与赞助商的关系,麻省理工学院于1988年成立了一个成员资助的联盟(麻省理工学院X联盟,1993年更名为X联盟)。由于MIT X联盟的范围有限(被设计),三个主要参与者要求他们新创建的联盟使用X技术创建一个可行的窗口方案,他们(三大供应商)可以围绕这个方案进行合并。我们的想法是同时提供API和GUI,或者仅仅提供第2节。太阳与标准化之战
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信