Approaches to developing integrated care in Europe: a systematic literature review

Vanessa Antunes, J. P. Moreira
{"title":"Approaches to developing integrated care in Europe: a systematic literature review","authors":"Vanessa Antunes, J. P. Moreira","doi":"10.1179/175330311X13016677137743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose Many European countries have been undertaking measures to promote integration of health and social care. The purpose of this study is to identify different approaches to integrated care and retrieve a number of experiences and approaches of working in some European countries. Methods A systematic review of the integrated care literature was conducted in a 3-month period. The Pubmed, Embase, and BioMed Central databases were searched for articles from 2002 through 2008. The articles were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. A standard form was used for data extraction. Findings A total of 24 studies that conformed to the criteria were found. The analysed articles describe integrated care in 16 European countries: UK, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Austria, Spain, Netherlands, Ireland, Portugal, Denmark, France, Greece, Italy, Norway, Poland, and Switzerland. The studies' setting was primary care, social care, home care, or a combination of these. In majority of the studies similar challenges to health care systems were identified: advances in health care, ageing population, multi-system nature of chronic diseases, hospital-based care system, insufficient provision of community care services, lack of cooperation among health and social care providers, fragmentation of the health and social care systems, and rurality. These challenges are seen as a stimulus to the integration of care. The articles also mentioned some integration strategies that were categorized according to: changes in organizational structure, workforce reconfiguring, and changes in the financing system. Integrated care definitions were also derived from the articles, and from the verbatim text when possible. Definitions were grouped according to their sectorial focus: community-based care, combined health and social care, combined acute and primary care, the providers, and in a more comprehensive approach the whole health system. Conclusion Despite integrated care being implemented in some European countries since the beginning of the millennium, it is a relatively new concept in health management discourse. There is room for more studies on the need for integrated care and the effectiveness of the implemented strategies. Despite integration models having a similar background there is no European consensus about the definition of integrated care. The data collected are useful for debate on the topic within the international health management and marketing community.","PeriodicalId":354315,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/175330311X13016677137743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Many European countries have been undertaking measures to promote integration of health and social care. The purpose of this study is to identify different approaches to integrated care and retrieve a number of experiences and approaches of working in some European countries. Methods A systematic review of the integrated care literature was conducted in a 3-month period. The Pubmed, Embase, and BioMed Central databases were searched for articles from 2002 through 2008. The articles were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. A standard form was used for data extraction. Findings A total of 24 studies that conformed to the criteria were found. The analysed articles describe integrated care in 16 European countries: UK, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Austria, Spain, Netherlands, Ireland, Portugal, Denmark, France, Greece, Italy, Norway, Poland, and Switzerland. The studies' setting was primary care, social care, home care, or a combination of these. In majority of the studies similar challenges to health care systems were identified: advances in health care, ageing population, multi-system nature of chronic diseases, hospital-based care system, insufficient provision of community care services, lack of cooperation among health and social care providers, fragmentation of the health and social care systems, and rurality. These challenges are seen as a stimulus to the integration of care. The articles also mentioned some integration strategies that were categorized according to: changes in organizational structure, workforce reconfiguring, and changes in the financing system. Integrated care definitions were also derived from the articles, and from the verbatim text when possible. Definitions were grouped according to their sectorial focus: community-based care, combined health and social care, combined acute and primary care, the providers, and in a more comprehensive approach the whole health system. Conclusion Despite integrated care being implemented in some European countries since the beginning of the millennium, it is a relatively new concept in health management discourse. There is room for more studies on the need for integrated care and the effectiveness of the implemented strategies. Despite integration models having a similar background there is no European consensus about the definition of integrated care. The data collected are useful for debate on the topic within the international health management and marketing community.
在欧洲发展综合护理的方法:系统的文献回顾
许多欧洲国家一直在采取措施促进保健和社会保健的一体化。本研究的目的是确定综合护理的不同方法,并检索一些欧洲国家的工作经验和方法。方法对3个月的综合护理文献进行系统回顾。检索了Pubmed、Embase和BioMed Central数据库中2002年至2008年的文章。根据纳入和排除标准选择文章。数据提取使用标准表格。结果符合标准的研究共24项。分析的文章描述了16个欧洲国家的综合保健:英国、德国、芬兰、瑞典、奥地利、西班牙、荷兰、爱尔兰、葡萄牙、丹麦、法国、希腊、意大利、挪威、波兰和瑞士。这些研究的设置是初级保健、社会护理、家庭护理或这些的组合。在大多数研究中,确定了卫生保健系统面临的类似挑战:卫生保健的进步、人口老龄化、慢性病的多系统性质、以医院为基础的保健系统、社区保健服务提供不足、卫生和社会保健提供者之间缺乏合作、卫生和社会保健系统的碎片化以及农村性。这些挑战被视为一体化护理的刺激因素。文章还提到了一些集成策略,这些策略按照组织结构的变化、劳动力的重新配置和融资系统的变化进行了分类。综合护理的定义也来源于文章,如果可能的话,也来源于逐字文本。定义根据其部门重点进行分组:社区保健、卫生和社会保健联合、急性和初级保健联合、提供者,以及以更全面的方式对整个卫生系统进行分组。尽管自本世纪初以来,一些欧洲国家实施了综合护理,但在卫生管理话语中,这是一个相对较新的概念。对综合护理的必要性和所实施战略的有效性进行更多的研究还有空间。尽管综合模式有着相似的背景,但欧洲对综合护理的定义并没有达成共识。所收集的数据有助于在国际卫生管理和营销界就这一主题进行辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信