Risk Factors for Unexpected Removal of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Proper Duration of the Catheter Maintenance

Narang Lee, Hyundong Chae, In-Hwan Kim
{"title":"Risk Factors for Unexpected Removal of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Proper Duration of the Catheter Maintenance","authors":"Narang Lee, Hyundong Chae, In-Hwan Kim","doi":"10.18858/smn.2020.11.1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Despite the advantages of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), many complications have led to the unexpected removal of catheters. On the other hand, there are no guidelines for the duration of PICC maintenance. This study analyzed the risk factors for the unexpected removal of PICC to suggest guidelines for the duration of catheter maintenance. Materials and Methods: Among 520 patients who underwent PICC insertion from January 2014 to December 2015, 407 were included. Unexpected removal was observed in 95 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for unexpected removal. The changing pattern of the probability of unexpected removal was analyzed by change point analysis. Results: Malignancy (OR=4.498, 95% CI=2.49∼8.125) and ICU hospitalization (OR=4.218, 95% CI=1.694∼10.505) were significant risk factors for the unexpected removal of PICC. The left arm (OR=0.279, 95% CI=0.143∼0.544) and basilic vein (OR=0.323, 95% CI=0.192∼0.545) were associated with a lower probability of unexpected removal compared to the right arm and brachial vein, but selection bias could exist in the arm side and vein. Change-point analysis revealed a rapid increase in the probability of unexpected removal after 54 catheter days. Conclusion: This study suggests the removal or exchange of PICC before 54 catheter days to minimize serious complications. More attention is needed for patients with malignancies and ICU stays. (Surg Metab Nutr 2020;11:27-33)","PeriodicalId":147842,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18858/smn.2020.11.1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the advantages of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), many complications have led to the unexpected removal of catheters. On the other hand, there are no guidelines for the duration of PICC maintenance. This study analyzed the risk factors for the unexpected removal of PICC to suggest guidelines for the duration of catheter maintenance. Materials and Methods: Among 520 patients who underwent PICC insertion from January 2014 to December 2015, 407 were included. Unexpected removal was observed in 95 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for unexpected removal. The changing pattern of the probability of unexpected removal was analyzed by change point analysis. Results: Malignancy (OR=4.498, 95% CI=2.49∼8.125) and ICU hospitalization (OR=4.218, 95% CI=1.694∼10.505) were significant risk factors for the unexpected removal of PICC. The left arm (OR=0.279, 95% CI=0.143∼0.544) and basilic vein (OR=0.323, 95% CI=0.192∼0.545) were associated with a lower probability of unexpected removal compared to the right arm and brachial vein, but selection bias could exist in the arm side and vein. Change-point analysis revealed a rapid increase in the probability of unexpected removal after 54 catheter days. Conclusion: This study suggests the removal or exchange of PICC before 54 catheter days to minimize serious complications. More attention is needed for patients with malignancies and ICU stays. (Surg Metab Nutr 2020;11:27-33)
外周置管中心导管意外拔出的危险因素及导管维持的适当时间
目的:尽管外周置管中心导管(PICC)有很多优点,但许多并发症导致了意外的导管拔除。另一方面,对于人保的维护时间没有指导方针。本研究分析意外取出PICC的危险因素,为导管维持时间提供指导。材料与方法:2014年1月至2015年12月,520例PICC置入患者中,407例纳入研究。在95例患者中观察到意外切除。进行单因素和多因素分析以评估意外切除的危险因素。采用变点分析法分析了意外移除概率的变化规律。结果:恶性肿瘤(OR=4.498, 95% CI=2.49 ~ 8.125)和ICU住院(OR=4.218, 95% CI=1.694 ~ 10.505)是PICC意外切除的重要危险因素。与右臂和肱静脉相比,左臂(OR=0.279, 95% CI=0.143 ~ 0.544)和basilic静脉(OR=0.323, 95% CI=0.192 ~ 0.545)与较低的意外切除概率相关,但选择偏倚可能存在于臂侧和静脉。变化点分析显示,54天后意外拔除的可能性迅速增加。结论:本研究建议在导管54天前取出或更换PICC,以减少严重并发症。需要对恶性肿瘤患者和ICU住院患者给予更多的关注。(中华外科杂志2020;11:27-33)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信