Deployment of a Novel Proppant Coating Technology for Controlling Airborne Dust in the Permian: A Case Study

S. Kakadjian, M. Reynolds, J. Sawyer, P. Kelly, V. Bammidi, Dennis Murray, M. Solomon
{"title":"Deployment of a Novel Proppant Coating Technology for Controlling Airborne Dust in the Permian: A Case Study","authors":"S. Kakadjian, M. Reynolds, J. Sawyer, P. Kelly, V. Bammidi, Dennis Murray, M. Solomon","doi":"10.2118/191420-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Occupational exposure to respirable silica from proppant sand is a risk to field personnel in oil and gas operations. This risk must be mitigated to comply with new OSHA regulations that will take place between 2018 and 2021 for limiting respirable crystalline silica to less than 50 micrograms per liter averaged over across an 8-hr period. Therefore, oil and gas operators, oilfield service companies, and proppant suppliers are poised to employ technologies that can address proppant dust control in the field.\n Historically, engineering controls have been applied to reduce sand dust using vacuum systems to gather dust in central locations; while other mechanical approaches include limiting sand volumes on conveyer belts or storing sand in silos (necessitating use of a trailer and a storage bin). This paper discusses laboratory and field results from tests designed to mitigate dust that results from handling sand during hydraulic fracturing operations. Coating proppant sand with inert chemical solutions that include a 100% environmentally-friendlybenign chemical blend at transloading rail facilities will be described.\n Experimental test results to be discussed include lab scale screening of 10+ aqueous and nonaqueous formulations to control dust, sand caking studies, sand flowability, changes in conductivity, bacterial control testing, and chemical compatibility testing with current additive packages used in slickwater and crosslinked gel systems.\n The outcome of field applications using coated sand samples in the Permian Basin showed up to a 97% decrease of dust generated and levels of employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica less than the revised OSHA PEL of 50 μg/m3 as measured in 10-mm nylon Dorr-Oliver cyclones.\n A long-term goal for this product is to eliminate the risk of respirable crystalline silica even less than the OSHA action levels at 25 μg/m3 to field staff and to reduce dust exposure to the equipment, improving safety and operational efficiency for operators.","PeriodicalId":441169,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191420-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational exposure to respirable silica from proppant sand is a risk to field personnel in oil and gas operations. This risk must be mitigated to comply with new OSHA regulations that will take place between 2018 and 2021 for limiting respirable crystalline silica to less than 50 micrograms per liter averaged over across an 8-hr period. Therefore, oil and gas operators, oilfield service companies, and proppant suppliers are poised to employ technologies that can address proppant dust control in the field. Historically, engineering controls have been applied to reduce sand dust using vacuum systems to gather dust in central locations; while other mechanical approaches include limiting sand volumes on conveyer belts or storing sand in silos (necessitating use of a trailer and a storage bin). This paper discusses laboratory and field results from tests designed to mitigate dust that results from handling sand during hydraulic fracturing operations. Coating proppant sand with inert chemical solutions that include a 100% environmentally-friendlybenign chemical blend at transloading rail facilities will be described. Experimental test results to be discussed include lab scale screening of 10+ aqueous and nonaqueous formulations to control dust, sand caking studies, sand flowability, changes in conductivity, bacterial control testing, and chemical compatibility testing with current additive packages used in slickwater and crosslinked gel systems. The outcome of field applications using coated sand samples in the Permian Basin showed up to a 97% decrease of dust generated and levels of employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica less than the revised OSHA PEL of 50 μg/m3 as measured in 10-mm nylon Dorr-Oliver cyclones. A long-term goal for this product is to eliminate the risk of respirable crystalline silica even less than the OSHA action levels at 25 μg/m3 to field staff and to reduce dust exposure to the equipment, improving safety and operational efficiency for operators.
一种新型支撑剂涂层技术用于控制二叠纪地区的空气粉尘:一个案例研究
支撑剂砂中的可吸入二氧化硅对于油气作业现场人员来说是一种风险。必须降低这种风险,以符合将于2018年至2021年实施的新的OSHA法规,将可吸入结晶二氧化硅在8小时内的平均浓度限制在每升50微克以下。因此,油气运营商、油田服务公司和支撑剂供应商都准备采用能够解决现场支撑剂粉尘控制问题的技术。从历史上看,工程控制已经应用于减少沙尘,使用真空系统在中心位置收集灰尘;而其他机械方法包括限制传送带上的沙子体积或将沙子储存在筒仓中(需要使用拖车和储存箱)。本文讨论了旨在减少水力压裂作业中处理砂产生的粉尘的实验室和现场测试结果。将描述在转运铁路设施中使用惰性化学溶液涂覆支撑剂砂,其中包括100%环保的化学混合物。要讨论的实验测试结果包括实验室规模筛选10多种水和非水配方,以控制粉尘,砂结块研究,砂流动性,电导率变化,细菌控制测试,以及与滑溜水和交联凝胶系统中使用的当前添加剂包装的化学相容性测试。在二叠纪盆地使用覆膜砂样品的现场应用结果显示,产生的粉尘减少了97%,员工暴露于可吸入结晶二氧化硅的水平低于修订后的OSHA PEL 50 μg/m3,这是在10毫米尼龙Dorr-Oliver气旋中测量的。该产品的长期目标是消除可吸入结晶二氧化硅的风险,甚至低于OSHA的25 μg/m3的行动水平,并减少设备的粉尘暴露,提高操作员的安全性和操作效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信