The problem of the definition of abortion in Polish literature and reception of church teaching in this regard

Stanisław Biały
{"title":"The problem of the definition of abortion in Polish literature and reception of church teaching in this regard","authors":"Stanisław Biały","doi":"10.34766/fetr.v49i1.788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of abortion is still relevant in the social discourse. Therefore, the author analyzed the conceptualisation of the act of abortion (present in Polish literature), conducted a questionnaire to confirm or exclude the obtained theoretical results, and asked about possible causes of such a phenomenon. Research shows that the Catholic Church has presented the doctrinal concept of abortion (precisely enough) in such documents as Qauesito de abortu procurato, Donum vitae, Evangelium vitae, and Dignitas personae. However, its definition (in terms of the subject matter) quite often differs from that found in various publications or statements referring to the Magisterium of the Church. This is a harmful situation, which may translate into a difficult reception of the Church’s teaching, as well as into respect for innocent human life. The point is that if the cognitive process is characterized by “intentionality” (the relation of the mind to the object), its objectivity may be hindered by volitional, ideological, conscious, contextual acts, etc. goals by oneself: scientific, political, ideological, social, moral, canonical, etc.","PeriodicalId":331430,"journal":{"name":"Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34766/fetr.v49i1.788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topic of abortion is still relevant in the social discourse. Therefore, the author analyzed the conceptualisation of the act of abortion (present in Polish literature), conducted a questionnaire to confirm or exclude the obtained theoretical results, and asked about possible causes of such a phenomenon. Research shows that the Catholic Church has presented the doctrinal concept of abortion (precisely enough) in such documents as Qauesito de abortu procurato, Donum vitae, Evangelium vitae, and Dignitas personae. However, its definition (in terms of the subject matter) quite often differs from that found in various publications or statements referring to the Magisterium of the Church. This is a harmful situation, which may translate into a difficult reception of the Church’s teaching, as well as into respect for innocent human life. The point is that if the cognitive process is characterized by “intentionality” (the relation of the mind to the object), its objectivity may be hindered by volitional, ideological, conscious, contextual acts, etc. goals by oneself: scientific, political, ideological, social, moral, canonical, etc.
波兰文献中堕胎的定义问题以及教会在这方面的教导
堕胎的话题在社会话语中仍然是相关的。因此,作者分析了堕胎行为的概念化(存在于波兰文献中),进行了问卷调查,以确认或排除所获得的理论结果,并询问这种现象的可能原因。研究表明,天主教会在诸如《堕胎的问题》、《生命的祝福》、《生命的福音》和《人格的尊严》等文件中提出了堕胎的教义概念(足够精确)。然而,它的定义(就主题而言)往往不同于在各种出版物或涉及教会训导的声明中找到的定义。这是一种有害的情况,它可能导致难以接受教会的教导,以及对无辜生命的尊重。关键是,如果认知过程的特征是“意向性”(心智与客体的关系),那么它的客观性可能会受到自己的意志、意识形态、意识、情境行为等目标的阻碍:科学的、政治的、意识形态的、社会的、道德的、规范的等等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信