Strategic Delegation of Environmental Policy Making: Corrections and Comments

K. Hattori
{"title":"Strategic Delegation of Environmental Policy Making: Corrections and Comments","authors":"K. Hattori","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1009425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this comment is to correct some mathematical and implicational errors in Roelfsema [in J.Environ.Econom.Management 53, 270-275 (2007)] who points out a new theoretical possibility explaining the discrepancy between theory and evidence about 'the race to the bottom' in non-cooperative environmental policy making. We also mention the primary factor in determining the effects of strategic voting and the applications of Roelfsema's results for another setting of the model.","PeriodicalId":219371,"journal":{"name":"SEIN Environmental Impacts of Business eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEIN Environmental Impacts of Business eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1009425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this comment is to correct some mathematical and implicational errors in Roelfsema [in J.Environ.Econom.Management 53, 270-275 (2007)] who points out a new theoretical possibility explaining the discrepancy between theory and evidence about 'the race to the bottom' in non-cooperative environmental policy making. We also mention the primary factor in determining the effects of strategic voting and the applications of Roelfsema's results for another setting of the model.
环境政策制定的战略授权:更正和评论
这一评论的目的是纠正Roelfsema [j . environmental . economy . management 53,270 -275(2007)]中的一些数学和隐含错误,他指出了一种新的理论可能性,解释了在非合作环境政策制定中“竞次”的理论和证据之间的差异。我们还提到了决定战略投票效果的主要因素,以及Roelfsema的结果在模型的另一种设置中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信