{"title":"Profit-Oriented Productivity Change: A Comment","authors":"B. Balk","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2910361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a comment on [6]. It is shown that: (1) their ‘profit-Luenberger’ productivity indicator (πL) appears to be identically equal to an empirical, profit-based Bennet quantity indicator, and (2) their ‘price effect’ (PE) is a residual without independent interpretation.","PeriodicalId":236717,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2910361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
This paper is a comment on [6]. It is shown that: (1) their ‘profit-Luenberger’ productivity indicator (πL) appears to be identically equal to an empirical, profit-based Bennet quantity indicator, and (2) their ‘price effect’ (PE) is a residual without independent interpretation.