Audit of the Aetiological Investigations Performed in Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss At Salford

Saud K AlHajeri, M. Iqbal
{"title":"Audit of the Aetiological Investigations Performed in Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss At Salford","authors":"Saud K AlHajeri, M. Iqbal","doi":"10.7227/MMJ.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This project aims to look at the Audiovestibular Physician’s practice at Salford and how closely it aligns with the gold standard guidelines set in the protocol lately published by the British Association of Audiological Physicians. Method: An audit was done retrospectively on 20 patients suffering from sensorineural hearing loss. As such, patient notes were utilised to ascertain which aetiological investigations have been completed and which were not. Any inadequacy in the aetiological work up has been dissected to help know the underlying reasons. Results: All patients had a thorough history taken and were comprehensively physically examined. 95% of patients underwent imaging in the form of MRI/CT. 80% received CMV testing. 75% underwent ECG testing. 60% received family hearing tests. Only 35% had ophthalmology examinations and 25% underwent urine and genetic testing. Conclusion: In some cases, the low compliance rates were due to the Audiovestibular Physician not ordering the investigation as part of the aetiological work up. This could be improved with the use of a dedicated checklist to act as an aid to the physician. Moreover, genetic counselling has been proposed to attempt to boost the compliance rates with genetic testing and similarly, leaflets briefing patients’ families about the importance of undergoing hearing tests themselves is another promising proposition to help improve the adherence","PeriodicalId":253562,"journal":{"name":"Manchester Medical Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manchester Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This project aims to look at the Audiovestibular Physician’s practice at Salford and how closely it aligns with the gold standard guidelines set in the protocol lately published by the British Association of Audiological Physicians. Method: An audit was done retrospectively on 20 patients suffering from sensorineural hearing loss. As such, patient notes were utilised to ascertain which aetiological investigations have been completed and which were not. Any inadequacy in the aetiological work up has been dissected to help know the underlying reasons. Results: All patients had a thorough history taken and were comprehensively physically examined. 95% of patients underwent imaging in the form of MRI/CT. 80% received CMV testing. 75% underwent ECG testing. 60% received family hearing tests. Only 35% had ophthalmology examinations and 25% underwent urine and genetic testing. Conclusion: In some cases, the low compliance rates were due to the Audiovestibular Physician not ordering the investigation as part of the aetiological work up. This could be improved with the use of a dedicated checklist to act as an aid to the physician. Moreover, genetic counselling has been proposed to attempt to boost the compliance rates with genetic testing and similarly, leaflets briefing patients’ families about the importance of undergoing hearing tests themselves is another promising proposition to help improve the adherence
索尔福德儿童感音神经性听力损失的病因调查审计
目的:本项目旨在研究索尔福德的听庭医生的实践,以及它与英国听力学医师协会最近发布的协议中设定的黄金标准指南的一致性。方法:对20例感音神经性听力损失患者进行回顾性审计。因此,利用病人的记录来确定哪些病原学调查已经完成,哪些没有。病因学工作中的任何不足之处都已被剖析,以帮助了解潜在的原因。结果:所有患者均有完整的病史和全面的体格检查。95%的患者接受MRI/CT影像学检查。80%接受巨细胞病毒检测。75%的患者接受了心电图检查。60%的人接受了家庭听力测试。只有35%的人接受了眼科检查,25%的人接受了尿液和基因检测。结论:在某些情况下,低依从率是由于听庭医生没有将调查作为病因学工作的一部分。这可以通过使用专门的检查表来帮助医生来改善。此外,遗传咨询已被提议试图提高基因测试的依从率,同样,向患者家属介绍自己进行听力测试的重要性的传单是另一个有希望的建议,以帮助提高依从性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信